From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Paul Clements <paul.clements-eviPjrN/1CxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: nbd-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nbd: add support for feature negotiation
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:00:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E686815.9060901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAECXXi6NO1gvmREr_31ve-k67fsirqerdm7=ZX0tYqx+Yj52Sw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
On 09/07/2011 11:54 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
>> > I named it differently intentionally, actually, because it should not use
>> > the flags field from the network protocol as is. Also, "features" sounds
>> > more like something that is optional, while unrecognized "flags" should
>> > probably cause a failure.
> Alright, I can buy that argument -- I don't feel that strongly about it...
>
> This looks good to me, then.
Actually no, I can do better. :)
Paolo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop
What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses
from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops
provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable
virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Paul Clements <paul.clements@us.sios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nbd: add support for feature negotiation
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:00:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E686815.9060901@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAECXXi6NO1gvmREr_31ve-k67fsirqerdm7=ZX0tYqx+Yj52Sw@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/07/2011 11:54 PM, Paul Clements wrote:
>> > I named it differently intentionally, actually, because it should not use
>> > the flags field from the network protocol as is. Also, "features" sounds
>> > more like something that is optional, while unrecognized "flags" should
>> > probably cause a failure.
> Alright, I can buy that argument -- I don't feel that strongly about it...
>
> This looks good to me, then.
Actually no, I can do better. :)
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-08 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-07 14:41 [PATCH 0/3] nbd: add support for DISCARD Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 14:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <1315406503-7883-1-git-send-email-pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-07 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] nbd: remove unused flags fields Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 14:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/3] nbd: add support for feature negotiation Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 14:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <1315406503-7883-3-git-send-email-pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-07 16:30 ` Paul Clements
2011-09-07 16:30 ` Paul Clements
[not found] ` <CAECXXi4YW++_302mcSTX=cPjbguSqcw3Weec85VrLFv1qNHXug-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-07 17:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 17:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <4E67AF6A.9090400-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-07 21:54 ` Paul Clements
2011-09-07 21:54 ` Paul Clements
[not found] ` <CAECXXi6NO1gvmREr_31ve-k67fsirqerdm7=ZX0tYqx+Yj52Sw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-08 7:00 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2011-09-08 7:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2011-09-07 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/3] nbd: map DISCARD requests to a new nbd request type Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <1315406503-7883-4-git-send-email-pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-08 1:13 ` Paul Clements
2011-09-08 1:13 ` Paul Clements
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E686815.9060901@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nbd-general-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paul.clements-eviPjrN/1CxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.