From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7A252F.2000402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7A1BCA.1090006@ti.com>
Benoit,
On 09/21/2011 12:15 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I'm testing that series with OMAP4 but have some issues for the moment :-(
>
> [ 0.000000] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:34 gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180()
> [ 0.000000] error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain
> [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.000000] [<c001b284>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0051c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0051c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c0051ce0>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0051ce0>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c05f6874>] (gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f6874>] (gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180) from [<c05fa2e0>] (omap_gic_of_init+0x8/0x28)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05fa2e0>] (omap_gic_of_init+0x8/0x28) from [<c0616b44>] (of_irq_init+0x148/0x28c)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0616b44>] (of_irq_init+0x148/0x28c) from [<c05f3074>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f3074>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c) from [<c05f0650>] (start_kernel+0x184/0x2fc)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f0650>] (start_kernel+0x184/0x2fc) from [<80008040>] (0x80008040)
>
> I'm not super familiar with all the irq stuff but I'm wondering if there is not something wrong with the test that print that message:
>
> void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> int hwirq;
>
> /*
> * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> */
> for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> if (d || d->domain) {
> /* things are broken; just report, don't clean up */
> WARN(1, "error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain");
> return;
> }
> [...]
>
> Is the (d || d->domain) correct? Shouldn't it be (d && d->domain)?
>
> But since that used to work properly, I have some doubt. Moreover the driver will not even get the proper interrupt later...
>
> Do you have any clue?
I fixed that in the prior series and tglx picked it up, so I did not
repost. It should hit mainline for 3.1, but I haven't verified if it is
in yet. Sorry for the confusion, I should have mentioned that.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
"marc.zyngier@arm.com" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"thomas.abraham@linaro.org" <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
"jamie@jamieiles.com" <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
"shawn.guo@linaro.org" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"dave.martin@linaro.org" <dave.martin@linaro.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7A252F.2000402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7A1BCA.1090006@ti.com>
Benoit,
On 09/21/2011 12:15 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I'm testing that series with OMAP4 but have some issues for the moment :-(
>
> [ 0.000000] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:34 gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180()
> [ 0.000000] error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain
> [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.000000] [<c001b284>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0051c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0051c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c0051ce0>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0051ce0>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c05f6874>] (gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f6874>] (gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180) from [<c05fa2e0>] (omap_gic_of_init+0x8/0x28)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05fa2e0>] (omap_gic_of_init+0x8/0x28) from [<c0616b44>] (of_irq_init+0x148/0x28c)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0616b44>] (of_irq_init+0x148/0x28c) from [<c05f3074>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f3074>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c) from [<c05f0650>] (start_kernel+0x184/0x2fc)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f0650>] (start_kernel+0x184/0x2fc) from [<80008040>] (0x80008040)
>
> I'm not super familiar with all the irq stuff but I'm wondering if there is not something wrong with the test that print that message:
>
> void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> int hwirq;
>
> /*
> * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> */
> for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> if (d || d->domain) {
> /* things are broken; just report, don't clean up */
> WARN(1, "error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain");
> return;
> }
> [...]
>
> Is the (d || d->domain) correct? Shouldn't it be (d && d->domain)?
>
> But since that used to work properly, I have some doubt. Moreover the driver will not even get the proper interrupt later...
>
> Do you have any clue?
I fixed that in the prior series and tglx picked it up, so I did not
repost. It should hit mainline for 3.1, but I haven't verified if it is
in yet. Sorry for the confusion, I should have mentioned that.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org"
<linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 12:55:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7A252F.2000402@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E7A1BCA.1090006-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Benoit,
On 09/21/2011 12:15 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> I'm testing that series with OMAP4 but have some issues for the moment :-(
>
> [ 0.000000] WARNING: at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:34 gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180()
> [ 0.000000] error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain
> [ 0.000000] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.000000] [<c001b284>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0051c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0051c34>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x4c/0x64) from [<c0051ce0>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0051ce0>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40) from [<c05f6874>] (gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f6874>] (gic_of_init+0x10c/0x180) from [<c05fa2e0>] (omap_gic_of_init+0x8/0x28)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05fa2e0>] (omap_gic_of_init+0x8/0x28) from [<c0616b44>] (of_irq_init+0x148/0x28c)
> [ 0.000000] [<c0616b44>] (of_irq_init+0x148/0x28c) from [<c05f3074>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f3074>] (init_IRQ+0x14/0x1c) from [<c05f0650>] (start_kernel+0x184/0x2fc)
> [ 0.000000] [<c05f0650>] (start_kernel+0x184/0x2fc) from [<80008040>] (0x80008040)
>
> I'm not super familiar with all the irq stuff but I'm wondering if there is not something wrong with the test that print that message:
>
> void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> int hwirq;
>
> /*
> * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> */
> for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> if (d || d->domain) {
> /* things are broken; just report, don't clean up */
> WARN(1, "error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain");
> return;
> }
> [...]
>
> Is the (d || d->domain) correct? Shouldn't it be (d && d->domain)?
>
> But since that used to work properly, I have some doubt. Moreover the driver will not even get the proper interrupt later...
>
> Do you have any clue?
I fixed that in the prior series and tglx picked it up, so I did not
repost. It should hit mainline for 3.1, but I haven't verified if it is
in yet. Sorry for the confusion, I should have mentioned that.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-20 20:24 [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` [PATCH 1/3] of/irq: of_irq_find_parent: check for parent equal to child Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 21:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 21:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 21:01 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 20:24 ` [PATCH 2/3] of/irq: introduce of_irq_init Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 23:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 23:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 10:01 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-21 10:01 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-21 10:01 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-23 2:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Rob Herring
2011-09-23 2:21 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-23 2:21 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-23 5:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 5:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-23 5:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-26 19:24 ` [PATCH v4] " Rob Herring
2011-09-26 19:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 19:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-27 1:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 1:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 1:53 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 13:03 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-27 13:03 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-27 13:03 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-27 21:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-27 21:24 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 20:24 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 23:08 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 23:08 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-20 23:08 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 1:54 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 1:54 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 1:54 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 17:15 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 17:15 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 17:15 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 17:55 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2011-09-21 17:55 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 17:55 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 19:28 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 19:28 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 19:28 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 20:27 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 20:27 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-21 20:27 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-26 19:57 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 19:57 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 19:57 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 20:49 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 20:49 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 20:49 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 21:11 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 21:11 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 21:11 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 21:32 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 21:32 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 21:32 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-26 22:00 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 22:00 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 22:29 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 22:29 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-26 22:29 ` Jamie Iles
2011-09-21 2:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings David Miller
2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 4:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 4:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-30 19:27 Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-04 23:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 23:44 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E7A252F.2000402@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.