From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@stericsson.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Stefan NILSSON9 <stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:23:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY=DFW+J_pQetK38mPqic2iBuDWCx5QZTo-NkL1L37Fuw@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> Well, the patch system says that each one depends on the previous one,
>> and the first one in the series contains the PIO read thing.
>>
>> Do 7108/1 onwards depend on 7106/1 and 7107/1 ?
>
> Probably my fault, since I was helping Ulf out with the patch tracker
> introduction.
>
> The patches should be pretty much semantically orthogonal as
> far as I can tell, the only reason dependency was stated that way
> was that I couldn't tell from head-parsing whether there were
> syntactical dependencies. (And wanted to avoid the annoyance
> of non-applying patches...)
>
> So if they apply, they are independent AFAICT.
7108/1 and 7109/1, have real dependencies. Otherwise there none.
BR
Ulf Hansson
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ulf.hansson@stericsson.com (Ulf Hansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 10:23:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY=DFW+J_pQetK38mPqic2iBuDWCx5QZTo-NkL1L37Fuw@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:45:48PM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> Well, the patch system says that each one depends on the previous one,
>> and the first one in the series contains the PIO read thing.
>>
>> Do 7108/1 onwards depend on 7106/1 and 7107/1 ?
>
> Probably my fault, since I was helping Ulf out with the patch tracker
> introduction.
>
> The patches should be pretty much semantically orthogonal as
> far as I can tell, the only reason dependency was stated that way
> was that I couldn't tell from head-parsing whether there were
> syntactical dependencies. (And wanted to avoid the annoyance
> of non-applying patches...)
>
> So if they apply, they are independent AFAICT.
7108/1 and 7109/1, have real dependencies. Otherwise there none.
BR
Ulf Hansson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 7:46 [PATCH 1/4] mmc: mmci: Bugfix in pio read for small packets Ulf Hansson
2011-09-27 7:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-01 16:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-01 16:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-03 7:08 ` Stefan Nilsson XK
2011-10-03 7:08 ` Stefan Nilsson XK
2011-10-07 13:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-07 13:38 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-07 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-07 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-14 7:38 ` Stefan Nilsson XK
2011-10-14 7:38 ` Stefan Nilsson XK
2011-10-07 13:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-07 13:45 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-08 9:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-08 9:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-09 6:59 ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-09 6:59 ` Linus Walleij
2011-10-10 8:23 ` Ulf Hansson [this message]
2011-10-10 8:23 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-13 15:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-13 15:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-10-14 8:07 ` Ulf Hansson
2011-10-14 8:07 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E92AB66.1030406@stericsson.com \
--to=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=stefan.xk.nilsson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.