From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, bp@amd64.org, pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com,
tj@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
rdunlap@xenotime.net, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
ashok.raj@intel.com, tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Mutually exclude cpu online and suspend/hibernate
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 18:15:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E92E8E0.4090004@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010123242.15067.48238.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
On 10/10/2011 06:03 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Don't allow cpu hotplug online operation and suspend/hibernate to run in
> parallel. If suspend/hibernate has already started, fail the cpu online
> operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/cpu.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 12b7458..bc8c7d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/stop_machine.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> +#include <linux/suspend.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> /* Serializes the updates to cpu_online_mask, cpu_present_mask */
> @@ -366,6 +367,14 @@ int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
> }
> #endif
>
> + /*
> + * Prevent cpu online and suspend/hibernate (including freezer)
> + * operations from running in parallel. Fail cpu online if suspend or
> + * hibernate has already started.
> + */
> + if (!trylock_pm_sleep())
Would it be better to hook into the suspend/hibernate notifiers and
use them to exclude cpu hotplug from suspend/hibernate, instead of
trying to take pm_mutex lock like this?
Peter, I remember you pointing out in another patch's review
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1198312/focus=1199087)
that introducing more locks in cpu hotplug would be a bad idea. Does that
comment hold here as well, or is this fine?
Anyways, I'll start working on that other implementation that hooks onto
the suspend/hibernate notifiers and see if that works out better.
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> cpu_maps_update_begin();
>
> if (cpu_hotplug_disabled) {
> @@ -377,6 +386,7 @@ int __cpuinit cpu_up(unsigned int cpu)
>
> out:
> cpu_maps_update_done();
> + unlock_pm_sleep();
> return err;
> }
>
>
--
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Linux Technology Center,
IBM India Systems and Technology Lab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-10 12:31 [PATCH v2 0/3] Freezer, CPU hotplug, x86 Microcode: Fix task freezing failures Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Introduce helper functions Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] Mutually exclude cpu online and suspend/hibernate Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:45 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2011-10-10 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 15:16 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-11 20:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-11 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-12 3:57 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-12 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-12 21:25 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-12 22:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-13 15:42 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-13 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-13 17:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-13 17:29 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-19 17:29 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-13 18:03 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-13 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-13 19:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-10 15:25 ` Alan Stern
2011-10-10 17:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-11 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-11 9:37 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 12:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] Update documentation Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Freezer, CPU hotplug, x86 Microcode: Fix task freezing failures Alan Stern
2011-10-10 15:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 16:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-10 17:14 ` Pavel Machek
2011-10-10 17:30 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 17:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-10 18:08 ` tj
2011-10-10 18:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-10-10 18:45 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 18:53 ` tj
2011-10-10 19:00 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 20:35 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20111010202913.GA30798@aftab>
2011-10-10 21:13 ` tj
2011-10-11 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 16:57 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E92E8E0.4090004@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.