* [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? [not found] ` <CAEDLWG0zxMBRq0N7tYTALQ6tMW97HtnYrvJrBAbbeDo56mXiLw@mail.gmail.com> @ 2011-11-02 13:23 ` Nick Khamis 2011-11-02 13:29 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Nick Khamis @ 2011-11-02 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cluster-devel.redhat.com I am actually buiding everything from source (glue, RA, pcmk, corosync/openais, dlm and friends), hoping that way I do not have to wait for the release of fedora 17 (May 2012). I actually need this as soon as possible. Nick On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote: >> That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable >> release of: >> * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld >> * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman >> >> will be availabile? > > Maybe fedora 17 > >> >> Thanks in Advance, >> >> Nick. >> >> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Hello Gents, >>>> >>>> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >>>> plans once the next >>>> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From what >>>> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. >>> >>> When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly >>> to corosync. >>> I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>> >>>> Nick. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>>> <bubble@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>>>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>>>> active/active using: >>>>>> >>>>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>>>> Cluster3 >>>>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>>>> OCFS2 >>>>>> >>>>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>>>> >>>>> You may look at >>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html >>>>> >>>>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>>>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>>>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>>>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>>>> >>>>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>>>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> Vladislav >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? 2011-11-02 13:23 ` [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? Nick Khamis @ 2011-11-02 13:29 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto 2011-11-02 13:57 ` Nick Khamis 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Fabio M. Di Nitto @ 2011-11-02 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cluster-devel.redhat.com On 11/2/2011 2:23 PM, Nick Khamis wrote: > I am actually buiding everything from source (glue, RA, pcmk, > corosync/openais, dlm and friends), > hoping that way I do not have to wait for the release of fedora 17 > (May 2012). I actually need this > as soon as possible. We always welcome patches and code contribution to speed things up. Fabio > > Nick > > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote: >>> That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable >>> release of: >>> * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld >>> * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman >>> >>> will be availabile? >> >> Maybe fedora 17 >> >>> >>> Thanks in Advance, >>> >>> Nick. >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Hello Gents, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >>>>> plans once the next >>>>> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From what >>>>> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. >>>> >>>> When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly >>>> to corosync. >>>> I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>>> >>>>> Nick. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>>>> <bubble@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>>>>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>>>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>>>>> active/active using: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>>>>> Cluster3 >>>>>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>>>>> OCFS2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>>>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>>>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>>>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>>>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>>>>> >>>>>> You may look at >>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html >>>>>> >>>>>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>>>>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>>>>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>>>>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>>>>> >>>>>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>>>>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Vladislav >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Linux-HA mailing list >> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? 2011-11-02 13:29 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto @ 2011-11-02 13:57 ` Nick Khamis 2011-11-02 14:19 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Nick Khamis @ 2011-11-02 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cluster-devel.redhat.com Fabio, Thank you so much for your response. Currently I compiled cman (for dlm and *_controld), pcmk, corosync, OpenAIS from source, and my original pcmk cluster stack is back up, and now with dlm and almost o2cb support thanks to cman. A few questions: * Any idea on David's progress of DLM from the unstable tree? Again, we will be using this in a pcmk stack * Just to make sure was the DLM package responsible for dlm_controld, and ocfs2_controld.pcmk? If so, are the plans to keep the ocfs_* support remain? As for our current setup with pcmk 1.1.6, and Cluster3, we are getting the following error from ocfs2_controld.pcmk: Nov 01 20:15:26 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: send_direct_ack: ACK'ing resource op astDRBD:1_notify_0 from 76:1:0:4a9306d4-a099-4b6f-ba84-404c302f45a8: lrm_invoke-lrmd-1320192926-6 Nov 01 20:15:26 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation astDRBD:1_notify_0 (call=10, rc=0, cib-update=0, confirmed=true) ok Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing key=7:2:0:4a9306d4-a099-4b6f-ba84-404c302f45a8 op=astIP_monitor_60000) Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 lrmd: [1491]: info: rsc:astIP:11: monitor Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing key=90:2:0:4a9306d4-a099-4b6f-ba84-404c302f45a8 op=astDRBD:1_notify_0) Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 lrmd: [1491]: info: rsc:astDRBD:1:12: notify Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing key=58:2:0:4a9306d4-a099-4b6f-ba84-404c302f45a8 op=astO2CB:1_start_0 ) Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 lrmd: [1491]: info: rsc:astO2CB:1:13: start Nov 01 20:15:27 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation astIP_monitor_60000 (call=11, rc=0, cib-update=17,confirmed=false) ok Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: send_direct_ack: ACK'ing resource op astDRBD:1_notify_0 from 90:2:0:4a9306d4-a099-4b6f-ba84-404c302f45a8: lrm_invoke-lrmd-1320192928-7 Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: process_lrm_event: LRM operation astDRBD:1_notify_0 (call=12, rc=0, cib-update=0, confirmed=true) ok Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 crmd: [1494]: info: do_lrm_rsc_op: Performing key=15:2:0:4a9306d4-a099-4b6f-ba84-404c302f45a8 op=astDRBD:1_promote_0) Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 lrmd: [1491]: info: rsc:astDRBD:1:14: promote Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: info: get_cluster_type: Cluster type is: 'cman' Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: info: get_local_node_name: Using CMAN node name: astdrbd1 Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: info: init_ais_connection_once: Connection to 'cman': established Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: info: crm_new_peer: Node astdrbd1 now has id: 1 Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: info: crm_new_peer: Node 1 is now known as astdrbd1 Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: ERROR: crm_abort: send_ais_text: Triggered assert at ais.c:346 : dest != crm_msg_ais Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: ERROR: send_ais_text: Sending message 0 via cpg: FAILED (rc=22): Message error: Success (0) Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: ERROR: crm_abort: send_ais_text: Triggered assert at ais.c:346 : dest != crm_msg_ais Nov 01 20:15:28 astdrbd1 ocfs2_controld: [1883]: ERROR: send_ais_text: Sending message 1 via cpg: FAILED (rc=22): Message error: Success (0) Nov 01 20:15:29 astdrbd1 pacemakerd: [1485]: WARN: send_ipc_message: IPC Channel to 1883 is not connected Nov 01 20:15:29 astdrbd1 lrmd: [1491]: info: RA output: (astIP:start:stderr) ARPING 192.168.2.6 from 192.168.2.6 eth2 Sent 5 probes (5 broadcast(s)) Received 0 response(s) Thanks in Advance, Nick. On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto <fdinitto@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/2/2011 2:23 PM, Nick Khamis wrote: >> I am actually buiding everything from source (glue, RA, pcmk, >> corosync/openais, dlm and friends), >> hoping that way I do not have to wait for the release of fedora 17 >> (May 2012). I actually need this >> as soon as possible. > > We always welcome patches and code contribution to speed things up. > > Fabio > >> >> Nick >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> That would be really great. Is there any talk of when the next stable >>>> release of: >>>> * pcmk+corosync supporting direct communication with dlm gfs, controld >>>> * The separation of dlm, gfs, controld from cman >>>> >>>> will be availabile? >>> >>> Maybe fedora 17 >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>> >>>> Nick. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew@beekhof.net> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Nick Khamis <symack@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> Hello Gents, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you so much for your response. That being said, what are the >>>>>> plans once the next >>>>>> release of CMAN does not include PCMK and DLM related implementation? From what >>>>>> I can see, libdlm will be separated from the project completely. >>>>> >>>>> When CMAN goes away, the dlm gfs controld's will be talking directly >>>>> to corosync. >>>>> I believe the work has already been done but may need additional testing. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks in Advance, >>>>>> >>>>>> Nick. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Vladislav Bogdanov >>>>>> <bubble@hoster-ok.com> wrote: >>>>>>> 28.10.2011 04:04, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello Everyone, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just want to make sure this is still the case before I go through >>>>>>>> with it. I am trying to setup an >>>>>>>> active/active using: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Corosync 1.4.2 >>>>>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.6 >>>>>>>> Cluster3 >>>>>>>> DRBD 8.3.7 >>>>>>>> OCFS2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The only reason I installed Cluster3 was for dlm support. Fencing >>>>>>>> would be handled by stonithd. >>>>>>>> Is there any reason I need to fully install and configure two cluster >>>>>>>> managers. Defining nodes in >>>>>>>> both cman and corosync/openais? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You may look at >>>>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org/msg09959.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That message contains Andrew's dlm_controld patch for shortening fencing >>>>>>> path - it now talks directly to stonith subsystem, rebased for 3.0.17, >>>>>>> and some fixes to make it all compile. Some work should probably be done >>>>>>> to make it apply/compile on latest cluster3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That way I eliminate cman from stack (except some dlm-related libs) and >>>>>>> run cluster with stable fencing on top of corosync/openais. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Vladislav >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Linux-HA mailing list >>>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Linux-HA mailing list >>> Linux-HA at lists.linux-ha.org >>> http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha >>> See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems >>> >> > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? 2011-11-02 13:57 ` Nick Khamis @ 2011-11-02 14:19 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Fabio M. Di Nitto @ 2011-11-02 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: cluster-devel.redhat.com On 11/2/2011 2:57 PM, Nick Khamis wrote: > Fabio, > > Thank you so much for your response. Currently I compiled cman (for > dlm and *_controld), pcmk, > corosync, OpenAIS from source, and my original pcmk cluster stack is > back up, and now with dlm > and almost o2cb support thanks to cman. A few questions: > * Any idea on David's progress of DLM from the unstable tree? Again, > we will be using this in a pcmk stack I already answered this. It?s next generation code. It?s ready when it?s ready. > * Just to make sure was the DLM package responsible for dlm_controld, > and ocfs2_controld.pcmk? If so, > are the plans to keep the ocfs_* support remain? ocfs2_controld comes from another project. You want to talk to the ocfs2 people about it. Fabio ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-11-02 14:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAGWRaZY9ouXBk9Vhrny-MFgprBwtRyJwo0fze0Z6QpLU_Jbk4w@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4EAA5AF3.9000800@hoster-ok.com>
[not found] ` <CAGWRaZZ+z69FVEYb8UH3BbOunb8DZiyjy2L8hh2B8TaC1v2EgQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAEDLWG29G5kYPo2NFfuXtuUaG+7_ATU61TEEfKaHCqPndNQ60A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAGWRaZaxKxn3fFZLPnswhZ0qk2DveW0tRF1vMSM-6+7F4sxu8A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAEDLWG0zxMBRq0N7tYTALQ6tMW97HtnYrvJrBAbbeDo56mXiLw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-02 13:23 ` [Cluster-devel] [Linux-HA] [Pacemaker] pcmk + corosync + cman for dlm support? Nick Khamis
2011-11-02 13:29 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
2011-11-02 13:57 ` Nick Khamis
2011-11-02 14:19 ` Fabio M. Di Nitto
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.