From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Plans for OE classic future
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:41:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECE81D3.2010603@opendreambox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111124170654.GA28572@sakrah.homelinux.org>
On 24.11.2011 18:06, Khem Raj wrote:
> On (24/11/11 10:31), Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> 2011/11/24 Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OE .dev will go read-only soon, If you need an OE-classic setup,
>>> 2011.03-maintenance is there for you.
>>>
>>
>> As stated before there are still people using .dev and committing to it
>> [1], and there are people interested in keeping it that way for a while.
>> So as it stands I suggest to keep it open for a while for those that still
>> are interested to use it.
>
> I would suggest that people interested in oe classic should use 2011.03
> branch since its maintained and tested regularly. Its in their best
> interest too since there are people behind the branch and it gets
> regular bug fixes thats not true for master.
I guess most people using OE are old enough to know better about their
own interests.
> I would like stronger arguments for why master and not 2011.03 release
> branch ?
Obviously, you can push a changeset to master, wait for someone to
complain about a bug, fix the bug, wait for silence, merge it into 2011.03.
Would you prefer experimental changesets in 2011.03?
Regards,
Andreas
P.S.: I'd really like to switch to oe-core, but at this time it's
impossible. I'm not multithreaded. Closing master won't make me switch
faster, but just annoy me. You'll just force me to keep any bugfixes and
enhancements in my own layer, so that no other body can benefit from them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AcyUlp+U2Tnulhz/TiaFJRlWYsvGkw==>
2011-10-27 10:53 ` Plans for OE classic future Mats Kärrman
2011-10-27 11:56 ` Henning Heinold
2011-10-27 12:27 ` Martin Jansa
2011-11-01 0:38 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-01 1:00 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-11-01 7:13 ` Jaap de Jong
2011-11-01 10:39 ` Henning Heinold
2011-10-27 17:44 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-10-27 23:56 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-23 20:46 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-23 21:18 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-23 21:30 ` Philip Balister
2011-11-26 21:12 ` Bernhard Guillon
2011-11-27 9:15 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-23 22:25 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-23 22:42 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 8:03 ` Mats Kärrman
2011-11-24 10:23 ` Hauser, Wolfgang (external)
2011-11-24 11:12 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 11:24 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-24 11:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 11:33 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-24 11:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 17:45 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-25 5:23 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-11-25 7:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-25 10:45 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-25 22:04 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 10:57 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-26 15:20 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 15:49 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 21:36 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:01 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-26 22:33 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:49 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 2:37 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 9:46 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-27 10:12 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:05 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 17:25 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 18:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 21:58 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-28 2:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:37 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-11-26 22:44 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-27 2:26 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 18:53 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-26 21:47 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-24 11:43 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-24 17:47 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-24 18:15 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 9:12 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-24 9:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-24 17:06 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 17:41 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2011-11-24 18:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-25 13:17 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-25 22:00 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-24 20:33 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-25 21:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 16:11 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 21:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-25 21:52 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 3:49 ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2011-11-26 15:45 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 16:56 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-26 21:28 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 9:55 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:15 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ECE81D3.2010603@opendreambox.org \
--to=obi@opendreambox.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.