From: Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: Plans for OE classic future
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 14:17:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ECF9562.30503@opendreambox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP9ODKrrnc8Op+At6CH2EJbUkTPafGuS=6wMmBXTFsBhA90oTA@mail.gmail.com>
On 24.11.2011 19:43, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 15:41, Andreas Oberritter <obi@opendreambox.org>wrote:
>
>> ...
>>
>> I would like stronger arguments for why master and not 2011.03 release
>>> branch ?
>>
>> Obviously, you can push a changeset to master, wait for someone to
>> complain about a bug, fix the bug, wait for silence, merge it into 2011.03.
>>
>
> Sure not; 2011.03 is for bugfixes not huge changesets with new things.
Who said "huge" or "new"? Even bugfixes need testing. That's why
changesets should go
through master after all.
>> Would you prefer experimental changesets in 2011.03?
>>
>
> This is not going to happen has 2011.03 is not a playground but a stable
> branch.
Exactly. That's what master is good for. Everything that hasn't been
tested in many environments is experimental by nature. You simply can't
commit anything to 2011.03 directly, for it would be experimental. It
has to be tested somewhere. That's master. (Yes, Koen, we know, OE-core
is an option, but not for some of us.)
> You're confusing development and maintainence branch meaning here.
Obviously not.
Regards,
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-25 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <AcyUlp+U2Tnulhz/TiaFJRlWYsvGkw==>
2011-10-27 10:53 ` Plans for OE classic future Mats Kärrman
2011-10-27 11:56 ` Henning Heinold
2011-10-27 12:27 ` Martin Jansa
2011-11-01 0:38 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-01 1:00 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-11-01 7:13 ` Jaap de Jong
2011-11-01 10:39 ` Henning Heinold
2011-10-27 17:44 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-10-27 23:56 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-23 20:46 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-23 21:18 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-23 21:30 ` Philip Balister
2011-11-26 21:12 ` Bernhard Guillon
2011-11-27 9:15 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-23 22:25 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-23 22:42 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 8:03 ` Mats Kärrman
2011-11-24 10:23 ` Hauser, Wolfgang (external)
2011-11-24 11:12 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 11:24 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-24 11:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 11:33 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-24 11:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-24 17:45 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-25 5:23 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-11-25 7:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-25 10:45 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-25 22:04 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 10:57 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-26 15:20 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 15:49 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 21:36 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:01 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-26 22:33 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:49 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-27 2:37 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 9:46 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-27 10:12 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:05 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 17:25 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 18:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 21:58 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-28 2:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 22:37 ` Raffaele Recalcati
2011-11-26 22:44 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-27 2:26 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 18:53 ` Ulf Samuelsson
2011-11-26 21:47 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-24 11:43 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-11-24 17:47 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-24 18:15 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 9:12 ` Koen Kooi
2011-11-24 9:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-24 17:06 ` Khem Raj
2011-11-24 17:41 ` Andreas Oberritter
2011-11-24 18:43 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-11-25 13:17 ` Andreas Oberritter [this message]
2011-11-25 22:00 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-24 20:33 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-25 21:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 16:11 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 21:43 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-25 21:52 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-26 3:49 ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2011-11-26 15:45 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-26 16:56 ` Paul Menzel
2011-11-26 21:28 ` Tom Rini
2011-11-27 9:55 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2011-11-27 17:15 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ECF9562.30503@opendreambox.org \
--to=obi@opendreambox.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.