Re: Plans for OE classic future

[Koen Kooi <koen@dominion.thruhere.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 24-11-11 12:43, Paul Eggleton schreef:
> On Thursday 24 November 2011 12:33:29 Paul Menzel wrote:
>> You seem to use OE-core and meta-oe already so I understand your point 
>> of view. Martin, Koen, Andreas and you are doing the major work for 
>> meta-oe and not a lot of other people contribute.
>> 
>> In my opinion it is a bad sign to force people to switch. OE-core and 
>> meta-oe should be so appealing that they switch by themselves. My 
>> impression from reading the list and from IRC is that a lot of people 
>> still have objections and are not totally comfortable. Good community 
>> management would be to listen to these people then try to find
>> solutions and implement them. People then should come by themselves.
> 
> Let's not get carried away. In the current discussion it seems the main 
> objection to switching from several people is that they are in the middle
> or close to the end of their development cycle on products that depend on
> OE- classic; it's totally understandable that those people can't switch
> at this time. I'm not entirely convinced those people can't use the
> 2011.3 maintenance branch for those purposes however.

Most, if not all people objecting to OE-classic closing seem to be on
2011.03-maintenance already. The confusion seems to be rooted into not
paying attention when Tom said fixes for the maintenance branch can go
through oe-core/meta-oe/whatever as well. That is even mentioned in the damn
wiki for the maintenance branch!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAk7Og0gACgkQMkyGM64RGpETAgCfX1jflPTMJCZndnIKZpKWTAvR
2psAoLqc0id3iCacEOuVu9bZVBPVwzBq
=AUUz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----