All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
	kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
	ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
	davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org,
	gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	kirill-oKw7cIdHH8eLwutG50LtGA@public.gmane.org,
	avagin-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org,
	devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
	mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323120903-2831-1-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>

On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during
> the last iteration.
>
> I should highlight:
> 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions)
>     it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it
>     deserves
> 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the
>     task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements.
>     To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent
>     pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate
>     through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway)
>
> The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes.
>

Kame,

Does this one address your previous concerns?

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, davem@davemloft.net, gthelen@google.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
	avagin@parallels.com, devel@openvz.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323120903-2831-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during
> the last iteration.
>
> I should highlight:
> 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions)
>     it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it
>     deserves
> 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the
>     task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements.
>     To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent
>     pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate
>     through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway)
>
> The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes.
>

Kame,

Does this one address your previous concerns?

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>, <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	<ebiederm@xmission.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<gthelen@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <kirill@shutemov.name>,
	<avagin@parallels.com>, <devel@openvz.org>,
	<eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	<hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <mhocko@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323120903-2831-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>

On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during
> the last iteration.
>
> I should highlight:
> 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions)
>     it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it
>     deserves
> 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the
>     task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements.
>     To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent
>     pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate
>     through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway)
>
> The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes.
>

Kame,

Does this one address your previous concerns?

Thanks

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
To: <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: <lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
	<kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>,
	<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	<davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
	<gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	<netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	<kirill-oKw7cIdHH8eLwutG50LtGA@public.gmane.org>,
	<avagin-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>,
	<devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	<eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	<cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	<hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
	<mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:06:17 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1323120903-2831-1-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>

On 12/05/2011 07:34 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is my new attempt to fix all the concerns that were raised during
> the last iteration.
>
> I should highlight:
> 1) proc information is kept intact. (although I kept the wrapper functions)
>     it will be submitted as a follow up patch so it can get the attention it
>     deserves
> 2) sockets now hold a reference to memcg. sockets can be alive even after the
>     task is gone, so we don't bother with between cgroups movements.
>     To be able to release resources more easily in this cenario, the parent
>     pointer in struct cg_proto was replaced by a memcg object. We then iterate
>     through its pointer (which is cleaner anyway)
>
> The rest should be mostly the same except for small fixes and style changes.
>

Kame,

Does this one address your previous concerns?

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cgroups" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-12-07 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-05 21:34 [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34 ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] Basic kernel memory functionality for the Memory Controller Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09  1:21   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:21     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found]     ` <20111209102113.cdb85da8.kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-09 12:40       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:40         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:40         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:40         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:37       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:37         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:37         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:37         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:44         ` David Laight
2011-12-09 14:44           ` David Laight
2011-12-09 14:44           ` David Laight
2011-12-09 14:48           ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:48             ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 14:48             ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-12  0:34         ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-12  0:34           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-12  0:34           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 21:34 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] foundations of per-cgroup memory pressure controlling Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1323120903-2831-3-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-09  1:24     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:24       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:24       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09 12:41       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:41         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:41         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] socket: initial cgroup code Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1323120903-2831-4-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-09  1:49     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:49       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:49       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  2:05     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  2:05       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  2:05       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09 12:43       ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:43         ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09 12:43         ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]         ` <4EE20254.6000308-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-12  0:33           ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-12  0:33             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-12  0:33             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-12  0:33             ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 21:34 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09  1:51   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:51     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 21:34 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] per-netns ipv4 sysctl_tcp_mem Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:34   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1323120903-2831-6-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-09  1:54     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:54       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:54       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] tcp buffer limitation: per-cgroup limit Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:35   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09  1:55   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:55     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] Display current tcp memory allocation in kmem cgroup Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:35   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09  1:56   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:56     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-05 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] Display current tcp failcnt " Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:35   ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:35 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] Display maximum tcp memory allocation " Glauber Costa
2011-12-05 21:35   ` Glauber Costa
     [not found]   ` <1323120903-2831-10-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-09  1:57     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:57       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:57       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
     [not found] ` <1323120903-2831-1-git-send-email-glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-12-07 11:06   ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2011-12-07 11:06     ` [PATCH v8 0/9] per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls Glauber Costa
2011-12-07 11:06     ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-07 11:06     ` Glauber Costa
2011-12-09  1:04     ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:04       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-12-09  1:04       ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDF48A9.6090306@parallels.com \
    --to=glommer-bzqdu9zft3wakbo8gow8eq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=avagin-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kirill-oKw7cIdHH8eLwutG50LtGA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=lizf-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.