All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Xen <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Suzuki Poulose <suzuki>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/4] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:24:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF5413.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111207104849.GA24849@amt.cnet>

On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op:  Kick a vcpu.
>> + *
>> + * @cpu - vcpu to be kicked.
>> + */
>> +static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpu);
>> +	struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
>> +
>> +	mp_state.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
>
> Since vcpu->mp_state is not protected by a lock, this is potentially racy. For example:
>
> CPU0						CPU1
> kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op				running vcpuN
> vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> 						kvm_emulate_halt
> 						vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED
>
> Is it harmless to lose a kick?
>

Yes you are right. It was potentially racy and it was harmful too!. I 
had observed that it was stalling the CPU before I introduced kicked flag.

But now,

vcpu->kicked = 1  ==> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu); ==>

__vcpu_run() ==> kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu) ==>

vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; so eventually we will end up
in RUNNABLE.

Also Avi pointed that, logically kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate should
be called only in vcpu thread, so after further debugging, I noticed
that,  setting vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; is not
necessary.
I 'll remove that in the next patch. Thanks for pointing.


			

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Xen <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/4] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:24:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF5413.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111207104849.GA24849@amt.cnet>

On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op:  Kick a vcpu.
>> + *
>> + * @cpu - vcpu to be kicked.
>> + */
>> +static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpu);
>> +	struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
>> +
>> +	mp_state.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
>
> Since vcpu->mp_state is not protected by a lock, this is potentially racy. For example:
>
> CPU0						CPU1
> kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op				running vcpuN
> vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> 						kvm_emulate_halt
> 						vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED
>
> Is it harmless to lose a kick?
>

Yes you are right. It was potentially racy and it was harmful too!. I 
had observed that it was stalling the CPU before I introduced kicked flag.

But now,

vcpu->kicked = 1  ==> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu); ==>

__vcpu_run() ==> kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu) ==>

vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; so eventually we will end up
in RUNNABLE.

Also Avi pointed that, logically kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate should
be called only in vcpu thread, so after further debugging, I noticed
that,  setting vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; is not
necessary.
I 'll remove that in the next patch. Thanks for pointing.


			

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Raghavendra K T <raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Xen <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V3 2/4] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:24:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EDF5413.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111207104849.GA24849@amt.cnet>

On 12/07/2011 04:18 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>
>> +/*
>> + * kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op:  Kick a vcpu.
>> + *
>> + * @cpu - vcpu to be kicked.
>> + */
>> +static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpu);
>> +	struct kvm_mp_state mp_state;
>> +
>> +	mp_state.mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
>
> Since vcpu->mp_state is not protected by a lock, this is potentially racy. For example:
>
> CPU0						CPU1
> kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op				running vcpuN
> vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE;
> 						kvm_emulate_halt
> 						vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_HALTED
>
> Is it harmless to lose a kick?
>

Yes you are right. It was potentially racy and it was harmful too!. I 
had observed that it was stalling the CPU before I introduced kicked flag.

But now,

vcpu->kicked = 1  ==> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu); ==>

__vcpu_run() ==> kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_UNHALT, vcpu) ==>

vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; so eventually we will end up
in RUNNABLE.

Also Avi pointed that, logically kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_mpstate should
be called only in vcpu thread, so after further debugging, I noticed
that,  setting vcpuN->mp_state = KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE; is not
necessary.
I 'll remove that in the next patch. Thanks for pointing.


			


  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-07 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-30  8:59 [PATCH RFC V3 0/4] kvm : Paravirt-spinlock support for KVM guests Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  8:59 ` [PATCH RFC V3 1/4] debugfs: Add support to print u32 array in debugfs Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  8:59 ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-06  0:13   ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06  0:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06  0:13     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06  0:13   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-11-30  8:59 ` [PATCH RFC V3 2/4] kvm hypervisor : Add a hypercall to KVM hypervisor to support pv-ticketlocks Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  8:59 ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-01 11:11   ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-01 11:11     ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-01 19:50     ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-01 19:50     ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-01 19:50       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-01 19:50       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-02 12:29       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-02 12:29         ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-02 12:29         ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-04 18:06       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-04 18:06         ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-04 18:06         ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-06 16:49         ` [Xen-devel] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06 16:49           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06 16:49           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-07 10:53           ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-07 10:53             ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-08 17:35       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-08 17:35         ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 10:48   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 10:48     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 11:54     ` Raghavendra K T [this message]
2011-12-07 11:54       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 11:54       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 12:33       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 12:33         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 12:33         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 12:47         ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-07 12:47           ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-07 13:39           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 13:39             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-12-07 14:52             ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-07 14:52               ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-07 16:46               ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 16:46                 ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 16:46                 ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-08  9:40                 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-08  9:40                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-08  9:40                   ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-09 10:59                   ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-09 10:59                     ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-09 10:59                     ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-09 10:59                   ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 16:46               ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 16:31         ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 16:31           ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-07 16:31           ` Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  9:00 ` [PATCH RFC V3 3/4] kvm guest : Added configuration support to enable debug information for KVM Guests Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  9:00 ` Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  9:00 ` [PATCH RFC V3 4/4] kvm : pv-ticketlocks support for linux guests running on KVM hypervisor Raghavendra K T
2011-12-06  3:27   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06  3:27     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2011-12-06  6:54     ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-06  6:54       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-12-06  6:54       ` Raghavendra K T
2011-11-30  9:00 ` Raghavendra K T

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EDF5413.1030107@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=raghukt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=levinsasha928@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.