All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:11:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB3C64.30008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112160538200.12660@utopia.booyaka.com>

On Friday 16 December 2011 06:08 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> On Friday 16 December 2011 04:46 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rajendra,
>>>
>>> I've combined your patches down to one patch and changed the logic a
>>> little bit.  It looks to me that the update and clear context registers
>>> can be done in one step, since an IP block shouldn't lose context when
>>> it's enabled.  But maybe I'm missing something?
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. The changes look fine and I also did a quick
>> test on an internal tree which supports core OSWR and it seems to
>> work fine too.
>
> Great, thanks.  Will wait on this one until you have a chance to tinker
> with it during the 3.4 time frame.

Sure, will work some more on this and maybe re-submit it with open 
switch RET support on OMAP4 when it would really be useful and can
also be tested to work well.

thanks,
Rajendra
>
>
> - Paul


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:11:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEB3C64.30008@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1112160538200.12660@utopia.booyaka.com>

On Friday 16 December 2011 06:08 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>
>> On Friday 16 December 2011 04:46 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rajendra,
>>>
>>> I've combined your patches down to one patch and changed the logic a
>>> little bit.  It looks to me that the update and clear context registers
>>> can be done in one step, since an IP block shouldn't lose context when
>>> it's enabled.  But maybe I'm missing something?
>>
>> Thanks for the patch. The changes look fine and I also did a quick
>> test on an internal tree which supports core OSWR and it seems to
>> work fine too.
>
> Great, thanks.  Will wait on this one until you have a chance to tinker
> with it during the 3.4 time frame.

Sure, will work some more on this and maybe re-submit it with open 
switch RET support on OMAP4 when it would really be useful and can
also be tested to work well.

thanks,
Rajendra
>
>
> - Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-16 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-03 10:54 [PATCH 0/3] Support omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count() for OMAP4 Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP: hmwod: Add support for per hwmod/module context lost count Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54   ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Update/Clear module specific context lost counters Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54   ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54   ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-29 18:10   ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-11-29 18:10     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-12-02  4:46     ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-02  4:46       ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 11:16       ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 11:16         ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 11:23         ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 11:23           ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:21           ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:21             ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:38             ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:38               ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:17         ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:17           ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:38           ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:38             ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:41             ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2011-12-16 12:41               ` Rajendra Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EEB3C64.30008@ti.com \
    --to=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.