Re: [PATCH 4/9] linux-yocto-tiny: New kernel recipe for poky-tiny distro (INCOMPLETE)

[Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com>]

On 11-12-21 11:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 12/21/2011 07:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 11-12-21 10:52 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/21/2011 06:56 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>> On 11-12-21 04:02 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>>>> linux-yocto-tiny drops the linux-tools and sets the KMACHINE
>>>>> branch to standard/tiny.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart<dvhart@linux.intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>
> ...
>
>>>>> +SRC_URI = "git://git.yoctoproject.org/linux-yocto-3.0;protocol=git;nocheckout=1;branch=${KBRANCH},meta;name=machine,meta \
>>>>> +           file://core.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://serial.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://ext2.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://rtc-pc.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://ramfs.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://devtmpfs.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://net.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://debug.cfg \
>>>>> +           file://lzma.cfg \
>>>>> +           "
>>>>
>>>> So I assume that the order of these doesn't really matter, and that
>>>> they are non-overlapping ? The answer must be yes, since you've been
>>>> testing this, and you don't have a .scc file to control their order :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's correct.
>>>
>>>> Other than that, it looks pretty good to me.
>>>
>>> Great. Did you have a close look at core.cfg? It along with things like
>>> devtmpfs and ramfs are likely to form the basis of the linux-yocto tiny
>>> ktype general policy.
>>
>> I had a 'medium' depth look :) I didn't see anything outrageous
>> or shocking. I'll loop back and have a better look later as well.
>
> I'm mostly interested in things that are MISSING.

Aha. That's different. I'll go back and look!

Bruce

>