All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Move gfn_to_memslot() to kvm_host.h
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:47:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0F0087.7030300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112104115.GA32021@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On 01/12/2012 12:41 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
> kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
> non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
> gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
>
> Rather than putting gfn_to_memslot() itself in a header, which would
> lead to increased code size, this puts __gfn_to_memslot() in a header.
> Then, the non-modular uses of gfn_to_memslot() are changed to call
> __gfn_to_memslot() instead.  This way there is only one place in the
> source code that needs to be changed should the gfn_to_memslot()
> implementation need to be modified.
>
> On powerpc, the Book3S HV style of KVM has code that is called from
> real mode which needs to call gfn_to_memslot() and thus needs this.
> (Module code is allocated in the vmalloc region, which can't be
> accessed in real mode.)
>
>  
> +static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> +search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots)
> +		if (gfn >= memslot->base_gfn &&
> +		      gfn < memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages)
> +			return memslot;
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> +__gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	return search_memslots(slots, gfn);
> +}

Please add a comment here explaining why these functions are inlined. 
There's also the call to kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(), which should be
changed to gfn_to_memslot(), to avoid code bloat.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Move gfn_to_memslot() to kvm_host.h
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:47:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0F0087.7030300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112104115.GA32021@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On 01/12/2012 12:41 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
> kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
> non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
> gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
>
> Rather than putting gfn_to_memslot() itself in a header, which would
> lead to increased code size, this puts __gfn_to_memslot() in a header.
> Then, the non-modular uses of gfn_to_memslot() are changed to call
> __gfn_to_memslot() instead.  This way there is only one place in the
> source code that needs to be changed should the gfn_to_memslot()
> implementation need to be modified.
>
> On powerpc, the Book3S HV style of KVM has code that is called from
> real mode which needs to call gfn_to_memslot() and thus needs this.
> (Module code is allocated in the vmalloc region, which can't be
> accessed in real mode.)
>
>  
> +static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> +search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots)
> +		if (gfn >= memslot->base_gfn &&
> +		      gfn < memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages)
> +			return memslot;
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> +__gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	return search_memslots(slots, gfn);
> +}

Please add a comment here explaining why these functions are inlined. 
There's also the call to kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(), which should be
changed to gfn_to_memslot(), to avoid code bloat.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Move gfn_to_memslot() to kvm_host.h
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:47:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F0F0087.7030300@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120112104115.GA32021@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On 01/12/2012 12:41 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> This moves __gfn_to_memslot() and search_memslots() from kvm_main.c to
> kvm_host.h to reduce the code duplication caused by the need for
> non-modular code in arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rm_mmu.c to call
> gfn_to_memslot() in real mode.
>
> Rather than putting gfn_to_memslot() itself in a header, which would
> lead to increased code size, this puts __gfn_to_memslot() in a header.
> Then, the non-modular uses of gfn_to_memslot() are changed to call
> __gfn_to_memslot() instead.  This way there is only one place in the
> source code that needs to be changed should the gfn_to_memslot()
> implementation need to be modified.
>
> On powerpc, the Book3S HV style of KVM has code that is called from
> real mode which needs to call gfn_to_memslot() and thus needs this.
> (Module code is allocated in the vmalloc region, which can't be
> accessed in real mode.)
>
>  
> +static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> +search_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots)
> +		if (gfn >= memslot->base_gfn &&
> +		      gfn < memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages)
> +			return memslot;
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline struct kvm_memory_slot *
> +__gfn_to_memslot(struct kvm_memslots *slots, gfn_t gfn)
> +{
> +	return search_memslots(slots, gfn);
> +}

Please add a comment here explaining why these functions are inlined. 
There's also the call to kvm_gfn_to_hva_cache_init(), which should be
changed to gfn_to_memslot(), to avoid code bloat.



-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-12 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-20  9:21 [PATCH] KVM: Move gfn_to_memslot() to kvm_host.h Paul Mackerras
2011-12-20  9:21 ` Paul Mackerras
2011-12-23 13:33 ` Alexander Graf
2011-12-23 13:33   ` Alexander Graf
2011-12-23 13:33   ` Alexander Graf
2011-12-26 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-26 13:22   ` Avi Kivity
2011-12-26 13:22   ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-02 15:23   ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-02 15:23     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-02 15:23     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-02 16:13     ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-02 16:13       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-02 16:13       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-12 10:41 ` Paul Mackerras
2012-01-12 10:41   ` Paul Mackerras
2012-01-12 10:41   ` Paul Mackerras
2012-01-12 14:57   ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-12 14:57     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-12 14:57     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-12 15:47   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-01-12 15:47     ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-12 15:47     ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-13  6:09   ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Mackerras
2012-01-13  6:09     ` Paul Mackerras
2012-01-13  6:09     ` Paul Mackerras
2012-01-16 13:18     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-16 13:18       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-16 13:18       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-16 13:21       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-16 13:21         ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-16 13:30     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-16 13:30       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-16 13:30       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-17  5:02       ` Paul Mackerras
2012-01-17  5:02         ` Paul Mackerras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F0F0087.7030300@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.