* So what happened to Edison??
@ 2012-01-30 21:47 jfabernathy
2012-01-30 21:51 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: jfabernathy @ 2012-01-30 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a build on
edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but other
than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV and
also tried the latest.
Error below:
ERROR: Function 'do_validate_branches' failed (see
/build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
for further information)
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
/build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
Log data follows:
| ERROR: Function 'do_validate_branches' failed (see
/build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
for further information)
NOTE: package
linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3:
task do_validate_branches: Failed
ERROR: Task 720
(/home/jim/poky/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb,
do_validate_branches) failed with exit code '1'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 21:47 So what happened to Edison?? jfabernathy
@ 2012-01-30 21:51 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-01-30 21:54 ` jfabernathy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-01-30 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jfabernathy; +Cc: yocto
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy <jfabernathy@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a build on
> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but other
> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV and
> also tried the latest.
I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
some other kernel
changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using meta-kernel-dev there
shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
several times today
myself).
Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
Cheers,
Bruce
>
> Error below:
>
> ERROR: Function 'do_validate_branches' failed (see
> /build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
> for further information)
> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
> /build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
> Log data follows:
> | ERROR: Function 'do_validate_branches' failed (see
> /build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
> for further information)
> NOTE: package
> linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3:
> task do_validate_branches: Failed
> ERROR: Task 720
> (/home/jim/poky/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb,
> do_validate_branches) failed with exit code '1'
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
--
"Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 21:51 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2012-01-30 21:54 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:12 ` Joshua Lock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: jfabernathy @ 2012-01-30 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto
On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a build on
>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but other
>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV and
>> also tried the latest.
> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
> some other kernel
> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using meta-kernel-dev there
> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
> several times today
> myself).
>
> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruce
I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git version
of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and meta-intel.
>> Error below:
>>
>> ERROR: Function 'do_validate_branches' failed (see
>> /build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
>> for further information)
>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>> /build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
>> Log data follows:
>> | ERROR: Function 'do_validate_branches' failed (see
>> /build/mycdv-poky/tmp/work/mycdv-poky-linux/linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3/temp/log.do_validate_branches.26787
>> for further information)
>> NOTE: package
>> linux-yocto-3.0.18+git2+59314a3523e360796419d76d78c6f7d8c5ef2593_2+0d19bde053589ca1f8cca8d740c902b06063ccbf-r3:
>> task do_validate_branches: Failed
>> ERROR: Task 720
>> (/home/jim/poky/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.0.bb,
>> do_validate_branches) failed with exit code '1'
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> yocto mailing list
>> yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 21:54 ` jfabernathy
@ 2012-01-30 22:12 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:33 ` jfabernathy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2012-01-30 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a build on
>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but other
>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV and
>>> also tried the latest.
>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
>> some other kernel
>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using
>> meta-kernel-dev there
>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
>> several times today
>> myself).
>>
>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bruce
>
> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git version
> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and meta-intel.
The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release,
did you pull the updates?
Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and
reproduce here.
Regards,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 22:12 ` Joshua Lock
@ 2012-01-30 22:33 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:43 ` Joshua Lock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: jfabernathy @ 2012-01-30 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a
>>>> build on
>>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but
>>>> other
>>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV
>>>> and
>>>> also tried the latest.
>>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
>>> some other kernel
>>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using
>>> meta-kernel-dev there
>>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
>>> several times today
>>> myself).
>>>
>>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>
>> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git version
>> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and
>> meta-intel.
>
> The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release,
> did you pull the updates?
>
> Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and
> reproduce here.
>
I tried some stuff this morning like switching branches, then doing git
pulls, etc. I was getting such bad results, I figured I had screwed
up. I re-cloned both poky and meta-intel earlier today. Maybe around
12 noon EST.
> Regards,
> Joshua
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 22:33 ` jfabernathy
@ 2012-01-30 22:43 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:47 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:51 ` jfabernathy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2012-01-30 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 30/01/12 14:33, jfabernathy wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>> On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a
>>>>> build on
>>>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but
>>>>> other
>>>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV
>>>>> and
>>>>> also tried the latest.
>>>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
>>>> some other kernel
>>>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using
>>>> meta-kernel-dev there
>>>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
>>>> several times today
>>>> myself).
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>
>>> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git version
>>> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and
>>> meta-intel.
>>
>> The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release,
>> did you pull the updates?
>>
>> Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and
>> reproduce here.
>>
>
> I tried some stuff this morning like switching branches, then doing git
> pulls, etc. I was getting such bad results, I figured I had screwed up.
> I re-cloned both poky and meta-intel earlier today. Maybe around 12 noon
> EST.
This sounds like meta-intel and the Edison updates aren't getting along.
Just to clarify are you using the latest poky edison branch? Which
meta-intel branch/tag are you using?
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 22:43 ` Joshua Lock
@ 2012-01-30 22:47 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:55 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:51 ` jfabernathy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: jfabernathy @ 2012-01-30 22:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 01/30/2012 05:43 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>
>
> On 30/01/12 14:33, jfabernathy wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>> On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a
>>>>>> build on
>>>>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> also tried the latest.
>>>>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
>>>>> some other kernel
>>>>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using
>>>>> meta-kernel-dev there
>>>>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
>>>>> several times today
>>>>> myself).
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git
>>>> version
>>>> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and
>>>> meta-intel.
>>>
>>> The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release,
>>> did you pull the updates?
>>>
>>> Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and
>>> reproduce here.
>>>
>>
>> I tried some stuff this morning like switching branches, then doing git
>> pulls, etc. I was getting such bad results, I figured I had screwed up.
>> I re-cloned both poky and meta-intel earlier today. Maybe around 12 noon
>> EST.
>
> This sounds like meta-intel and the Edison updates aren't getting
> along. Just to clarify are you using the latest poky edison branch?
> Which meta-intel branch/tag are you using?
>
What I did after cloning Poky and Meta-intel, I cheched out edison in
both poky and meta-intel direction using the same command that they use
in Developer Manual Appendix A.
> Cheers,
> Joshua
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 22:43 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:47 ` jfabernathy
@ 2012-01-30 22:51 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-31 4:37 ` Joshua Lock
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: jfabernathy @ 2012-01-30 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 01/30/2012 05:43 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>
>
> On 30/01/12 14:33, jfabernathy wrote:
>> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>> On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a
>>>>>> build on
>>>>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> also tried the latest.
>>>>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
>>>>> some other kernel
>>>>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using
>>>>> meta-kernel-dev there
>>>>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
>>>>> several times today
>>>>> myself).
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git
>>>> version
>>>> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and
>>>> meta-intel.
>>>
>>> The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release,
>>> did you pull the updates?
>>>
>>> Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and
>>> reproduce here.
>>>
>>
>> I tried some stuff this morning like switching branches, then doing git
>> pulls, etc. I was getting such bad results, I figured I had screwed up.
>> I re-cloned both poky and meta-intel earlier today. Maybe around 12 noon
>> EST.
>
> This sounds like meta-intel and the Edison updates aren't getting
> along. Just to clarify are you using the latest poky edison branch?
> Which meta-intel branch/tag are you using?
>
Could my having a local download directory that is used on all bakes
cause this problem???
> Cheers,
> Joshua
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 22:47 ` jfabernathy
@ 2012-01-30 22:55 ` Joshua Lock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2012-01-30 22:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 30/01/12 14:47, jfabernathy wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 05:43 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30/01/12 14:33, jfabernathy wrote:
>>> On 01/30/2012 05:12 PM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>>> On 30/01/12 13:54, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>>> On 01/30/2012 04:51 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:47 PM, jfabernathy<jfabernathy@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> It seems that something happened today. I could not complete a
>>>>>>> build on
>>>>>>> edison branch for meta-cedartrail. I copied it to meta-mycdv, but
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> than that same, old same old. I tried the standard unchanged SRCREV
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> also tried the latest.
>>>>>> I changed the main yocto 1.2 3.0 kernel repository to 3.0, and pushed
>>>>>> some other kernel
>>>>>> changes. But if you are purely on edison, and aren't using
>>>>>> meta-kernel-dev there
>>>>>> shouldn't have been any fallout from those changes. (I built 3.0
>>>>>> several times today
>>>>>> myself).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps Josh knows if anything was pushed to edison ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm retesting on the tarballs again. If successful I'll try git
>>>>> version
>>>>> of edison. I started today with complete new clone of poky and
>>>>> meta-intel.
>>>>
>>>> The Edison branch has been updated today for the upcoming 1.1 release,
>>>> did you pull the updates?
>>>>
>>>> Other than meta-intel are you using any other layers? I will try and
>>>> reproduce here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I tried some stuff this morning like switching branches, then doing git
>>> pulls, etc. I was getting such bad results, I figured I had screwed up.
>>> I re-cloned both poky and meta-intel earlier today. Maybe around 12 noon
>>> EST.
>>
>> This sounds like meta-intel and the Edison updates aren't getting
>> along. Just to clarify are you using the latest poky edison branch?
>> Which meta-intel branch/tag are you using?
>>
> What I did after cloning Poky and Meta-intel, I cheched out edison in
> both poky and meta-intel direction using the same command that they use
> in Developer Manual Appendix A.
Right. I think we'll need to change the manual, at least to make it
clear that the branches are not static.
As an aside to that I will see if I can figure out what's causing the
error you reported.
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: So what happened to Edison??
2012-01-30 22:51 ` jfabernathy
@ 2012-01-31 4:37 ` Joshua Lock
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2012-01-31 4:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 30/01/12 14:51, jfabernathy wrote:
> Could my having a local download directory that is used on all bakes
> cause this problem???
Not at all, that's fully supported.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-31 4:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-01-30 21:47 So what happened to Edison?? jfabernathy
2012-01-30 21:51 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-01-30 21:54 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:12 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:33 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:43 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:47 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-30 22:55 ` Joshua Lock
2012-01-30 22:51 ` jfabernathy
2012-01-31 4:37 ` Joshua Lock
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.