From: Joshua Lock <josh@linux.intel.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [pull-sys940x 2/4] ranpwd: Add ranpwd recipe
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:59:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F306968.9000902@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405123.nGGmjXUAYO@helios>
On 06/02/12 08:17, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 02 February 2012 13:11:19 Joshua Lock wrote:
>> Apologies. I'm wrong here. It was PRIORITY which we agreed to drop.
>
> It's worth noting however, at the same time PRIORITY removal was discussed it
> was acknowledged that SECTION was questionable. Logical grouping of
> recipes/packages is a useful thing but coming up with groupings that are
> meaningful in all contexts is hard :(
Glad to know my recollection isn't wildly off the mark.
I noticed that there are similar, yet different, SECTION values being
used. If we opt to keep SECTION I wonder if we should try and
standardise/sanitise it?
Debian's sections seem like reasonable inspiration?
http://packages.debian.org/stable/
I think SECTION is useful for tools like Hob and Narcissus, so I'm in
favour of keeping them.
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-01 22:26 [pull-sys940x 0/4][meta-intel] Inforce SYS940X BSP (Intel Atom E6xx + EG20T) Darren Hart
2012-02-01 22:26 ` [pull-sys940x 1/4] meta-intel: Add Inforce SYS940x BSP Darren Hart
2012-02-01 22:37 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-01 23:05 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 18:07 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-01 22:26 ` [pull-sys940x 2/4] ranpwd: Add ranpwd recipe Darren Hart
2012-02-01 22:40 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 7:22 ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-02 18:26 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 19:13 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 19:34 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 18:24 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 19:24 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 19:32 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 21:11 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-06 16:17 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-02-06 23:59 ` Joshua Lock [this message]
2012-02-07 7:06 ` Martin Jansa
2012-02-07 9:20 ` [yocto] " Koen Kooi
2012-02-11 0:14 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-11 1:45 ` Khem Raj
2012-02-01 22:26 ` [pull-sys940x 3/4] genmac: Replace RANDOM_MAC in network/interfaces with a randomly generated MAC Darren Hart
2012-02-01 22:42 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 18:27 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 14:09 ` William Mills
2012-02-02 17:19 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 18:37 ` William Mills
2012-02-01 22:26 ` [pull-sys940x 4/4] netbase: Add interfaces with RANDOM_MAC for sys940x* machines Darren Hart
2012-02-01 22:52 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-01 23:03 ` Joshua Lock
2012-02-02 18:31 ` Darren Hart
2012-02-02 19:02 ` Joshua Lock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F306968.9000902@linux.intel.com \
--to=josh@linux.intel.com \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yocto@yoctoproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.