bitbake versions

bitbake versions

[Rich Pixley]

I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake > 1.12.

Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be 
built with bitbake > 1.12?

If so, then the getting started document should probably include this info.

--rich

Re: bitbake versions

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@palm.com> wrote:
> I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake > 1.12.
>
> Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be built
> with bitbake > 1.12?

I have used 1.10.x successfully with old oe classic but that was sometime ago
if you want to use oe classic please use the
2011.03-maintenance branch you stand a better chance with that branch


>
> If so, then the getting started document should probably include this info.

yes getting started should reflect how to get started with layered oe.

>
> --rich
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: bitbake versions

[Rich Pixley]

Er... wasn't doing so intentionally.  Was just following the "getting 
started" page on the wiki.

I think that page needs to be adjusted to at least warn folks that it's 
stale.  That probably isn't the right way to "get started" today.

I'll start over from 'core.

--rich

On 2/8/12 17:47 , Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Rich Pixley<rich.pixley@palm.com>  wrote:
>> I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake>  1.12.
>>
>> Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be built
>> with bitbake>  1.12?
> I have used 1.10.x successfully with old oe classic but that was sometime ago
> if you want to use oe classic please use the
> 2011.03-maintenance branch you stand a better chance with that branch
>
>
>> If so, then the getting started document should probably include this info.
> yes getting started should reflect how to get started with layered oe.
>
>> --rich
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: bitbake versions

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Rich Pixley <rich.pixley@palm.com> wrote:
> I'll start over from 'core.

yeah right now we know that documentation is a bit of problem and we seek
people contributing to it as they move into oe-core/layered world

You can look at angstrom e.g. or yocto on how they utilize oe-core
in a layered design.

Re: bitbake versions

[Andrei Gherzan]

On 02/09/2012 01:26 AM, Rich Pixley wrote:
> I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake > 1.12.
>
> Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be 
> built with bitbake > 1.12?
>
> If so, then the getting started document should probably include this 
> info. 
I just finished a core-image-minimal + some other packages using bitbake 
form git, branch master. So i don't think that there a problem with 
bitbake in your case. What error you encountered? What is your system 
shell? Hope bash.

@g

Re: bitbake versions

[Frans Meulenbroeks]

2012/2/9 Andrei Gherzan <andrei@gherzan.ro>:
> On 02/09/2012 01:26 AM, Rich Pixley wrote:
>>
>> I'm having trouble even parsing using bitbake > 1.12.
>>
>> Am I right in thinking that the openembedded tree isn't ready to be built
>> with bitbake > 1.12?
>>
>> If so, then the getting started document should probably include this
>> info.
>
> I just finished a core-image-minimal + some other packages using bitbake
> form git, branch master. So i don't think that there a problem with bitbake
> in your case. What error you encountered? What is your system shell? Hope
> bash.
>
> @g
>
>

If one is using oe-classic then bitbakes > 1.12 indeed introduce issues.
One that I recall is that it gives a warning if there is a # in a
variable (e.g. when commenting out a patch in a recipe).
But there were other ones too actually blocking it.

If you are using oe-classic better stay with 1.12.
For oe-core probably the latest version of bitbake is the best choice.

Frans

Re: bitbake versions

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Andrei Gherzan <andrei@gherzan.ro> wrote:
> I just finished a core-image-minimal + some other packages using bitbake
> form git, branch master. So i don't think that there a problem with bitbake
> in your case. What error you encountered? What is your system shell? Hope
> bash.

You are using oe-core he is using oe classic.