From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: Markus Gutschke <markus@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
davem@davemloft.net, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
mcgrathr@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, luto@mit.edu,
eparis@redhat.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, djm@mindrot.org,
scarybeasts@gmail.com, indan@nul.nu, pmoore@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:43:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3DA2BC.7010706@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqD9hZd41AWZub+wxGWwxJtGWfk+pVWQhn7DM_0q0tS9r_wDA@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/16/2012 03:00 PM, Will Drewry wrote:
>
> Without the addition of x32, it is still the intersection of
> is_compat_task()/TS_COMPAT and CONFIG_64BIT for all arches to
> determine if the call is 32-bit or 64-bit, but this will add another
> wrinkle. Would it make sense to assume that system call namespaces
> may be ever expanding and offer up an unsigned integer value?
>
This is definitely the most general solution.
By the way, although most processes only use one set of system calls,
there are legitimate reasons for cross-mode tasks, and those probably
have a high overlap with the ones that would benefit from this kind of
filtering facility, e.g. pin.
-hpa
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: Markus Gutschke <markus@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
davem@davemloft.net, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, rdunlap@xenotime.net,
mcgrathr@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, luto@mit.edu,
eparis@redhat.com, serge.hallyn@canonical.com, djm@mindrot.org,
scarybeasts@gmail.com, indan@nul.nu, pmoore@redhat.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/8] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 16:43:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3DA2BC.7010706@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABqD9hZd41AWZub+wxGWwxJtGWfk+pVWQhn7DM_0q0tS9r_wDA@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/16/2012 03:00 PM, Will Drewry wrote:
>
> Without the addition of x32, it is still the intersection of
> is_compat_task()/TS_COMPAT and CONFIG_64BIT for all arches to
> determine if the call is 32-bit or 64-bit, but this will add another
> wrinkle. Would it make sense to assume that system call namespaces
> may be ever expanding and offer up an unsigned integer value?
>
This is definitely the most general solution.
By the way, although most processes only use one set of system calls,
there are legitimate reasons for cross-mode tasks, and those probably
have a high overlap with the ones that would benefit from this kind of
filtering facility, e.g. pin.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-16 20:02 [PATCH v8 1/8] sk_run_filter: add support for custom load_pointer Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] seccomp: kill the seccomp_t typedef Will Drewry
2012-02-20 2:55 ` James Morris
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] seccomp: add system call filtering using BPF Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 20:25 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:25 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:17 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 21:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 21:28 ` [kernel-hardening] " Markus Gutschke
2012-02-16 21:28 ` Markus Gutschke
2012-02-16 21:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 21:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 21:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:51 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 22:06 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 22:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 23:00 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 23:00 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 0:23 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Lutomirski
2012-02-17 0:23 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-02-17 0:43 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2012-02-17 0:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 0:50 ` [kernel-hardening] " Eric Paris
2012-02-17 0:50 ` Eric Paris
2012-02-17 2:24 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 2:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 3:53 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-17 3:53 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 4:12 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 4:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 4:26 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-17 4:26 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 4:32 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 4:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 4:40 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-17 4:40 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:31 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:31 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 0:48 ` [kernel-hardening] " Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 0:48 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 0:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Lutomirski
2012-02-17 0:51 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-02-17 1:10 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 1:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 1:25 ` [kernel-hardening] " Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 1:25 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 1:33 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 1:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 2:00 ` [kernel-hardening] " Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 2:00 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 2:16 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Lutomirski
2012-02-17 2:16 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2012-02-17 2:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 2:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 3:27 ` [kernel-hardening] " Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 3:27 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 4:09 ` [kernel-hardening] " H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 4:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-17 4:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 4:51 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 2:44 ` [kernel-hardening] " Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 2:44 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 2:44 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 2:44 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 3:38 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] seccomp: add SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET_TRAP Will Drewry
[not found] ` <CAE6n16mCrJC=Sre+PT1H_VfSjW0MGyi0xtEcdcRvGMvvwXWzmA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-02-16 20:28 ` Markus Gutschke
2012-02-16 21:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 20:42 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:42 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:11 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v9 " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:11 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:11 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v9 8/8] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:11 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:28 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] seccomp: Add SECCOMP_RET_TRAP H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 21:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-02-16 21:33 ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Drewry
2012-02-16 21:33 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] ptrace,seccomp: Add PTRACE_SECCOMP support Will Drewry
2012-02-17 5:08 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 5:08 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 5:08 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 16:23 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 22:55 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-21 17:31 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] x86: Enable HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:02 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:08 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] sk_run_filter: add support for custom load_pointer Will Drewry
2012-02-16 20:08 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 1:54 ` Joe Perches
2012-02-17 2:22 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 3:04 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 3:04 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 3:04 ` Indan Zupancic
2012-02-17 4:13 ` Will Drewry
2012-02-17 5:05 ` Indan Zupancic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3DA2BC.7010706@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=djm@mindrot.org \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=indan@nul.nu \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@mit.edu \
--cc=markus@chromium.org \
--cc=mcgrathr@chromium.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=scarybeasts@gmail.com \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.