All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: i.mitsyanko@samsung.com,
	"Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"KVM devel mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	quintela@redhat.com,
	"Developers qemu-devel" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Dmitry Solodkiy" <d.solodkiy@samsung.com>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:17:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F54D914.2010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F54D87E.1090109@codemonkey.ws>

On 03/05/2012 05:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> The other alternative is to s/target_phys_addr_t/uint64_t/ in the memory
>> API.  I think 32-on-32 is quite rare these days, so it wouldn't be much
>> of a performance issue.
>
>
> I think this makes sense independent of other discussions regarding
> fixing target_phys_addr_t size.
>
> Hardware addresses should be independent of the target.  If we wanted
> to use a hw_addr_t that would be okay too.
>

Would this hw_addr (s/_t$//, or you'll be Blued) be fixed at uint64_t
(and thus only documentary), or also subject to multiple compilation?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	i.mitsyanko@samsung.com,
	"KVM devel mailing list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	quintela@redhat.com,
	"Developers qemu-devel" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"Dmitry Solodkiy" <d.solodkiy@samsung.com>,
	"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for tuesday 31
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:17:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F54D914.2010203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F54D87E.1090109@codemonkey.ws>

On 03/05/2012 05:15 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> The other alternative is to s/target_phys_addr_t/uint64_t/ in the memory
>> API.  I think 32-on-32 is quite rare these days, so it wouldn't be much
>> of a performance issue.
>
>
> I think this makes sense independent of other discussions regarding
> fixing target_phys_addr_t size.
>
> Hardware addresses should be independent of the target.  If we wanted
> to use a hw_addr_t that would be okay too.
>

Would this hw_addr (s/_t$//, or you'll be Blued) be fixed at uint64_t
(and thus only documentary), or also subject to multiple compilation?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-30 18:55 KVM call agenda for tuesday 31 Juan Quintela
2012-01-30 18:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2012-01-30 23:41 ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 23:41   ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-30 23:53   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-30 23:53     ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31  0:37     ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-31  0:37       ` Alexander Graf
2012-01-31 10:49     ` Lluís Vilanova
2012-01-31 13:15     ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-31 13:15       ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-31 14:01       ` Mitsyanko Igor
2012-01-31 14:01         ` Mitsyanko Igor
2012-08-08 16:25         ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-08 16:25           ` Andreas Färber
2012-08-09  7:53           ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-08-09  7:53             ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-01-31 14:12       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 14:12         ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 15:04         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-31 15:04           ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-31 15:10           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-31 15:10             ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-01-31 15:12         ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-01-31 15:12           ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-02-09 22:23       ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-09 22:23         ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2012-02-09 22:37         ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-09 22:37           ` Anthony Liguori
2012-02-09 22:42           ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-09 22:42             ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2012-02-09 23:17           ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-09 23:17             ` Andreas Färber
2012-02-09 23:21             ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-09 23:21               ` Alexander Graf
2012-02-21 15:33         ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-21 15:33           ` Peter Maydell
2012-02-22  8:06           ` Mitsyanko Igor
2012-02-22  8:06             ` Mitsyanko Igor
2012-03-05 13:38           ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-05 13:38             ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-05 14:13             ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 14:13               ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 14:37               ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-05 14:37                 ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-05 15:10                 ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:10                   ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:15                   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-05 15:15                     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-03-05 15:17                     ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2012-03-05 15:17                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 18:53                       ` Blue Swirl
2012-03-05 18:53                         ` Blue Swirl
2012-03-05 20:58                         ` malc
2012-03-05 20:58                           ` [Qemu-devel] " malc
2012-03-05 15:20                   ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:20                     ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:21                     ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:21                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:27                       ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:27                         ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:43                   ` Andreas Färber
2012-03-05 15:43                     ` [Qemu-devel] " Andreas Färber
2012-03-05 15:47                     ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:47                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 15:50                     ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 15:50                       ` Peter Maydell
2012-03-05 17:27                       ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-05 17:27                         ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-12  9:43           ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-12  9:43             ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-14  9:30             ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-14  9:30               ` Igor Mitsyanko
2012-03-14 10:16             ` Avi Kivity
2012-03-14 10:16               ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 13:59   ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 13:59     ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 14:09     ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 14:09       ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 14:17       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-01-31 14:44         ` Avi Kivity
2012-01-31 16:23     ` Andreas Färber
2012-01-31 16:23       ` Andreas Färber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F54D914.2010203@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=d.solodkiy@samsung.com \
    --cc=i.mitsyanko@samsung.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.