From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:23:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5D8F65.7000205@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203092102450.30879@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Saturday 10 March 2012 09:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> The main outstanding question is whether the OMAP4 WUCLKOUT poll should be
> removed to match the v5 changes to the OMAP3 function. Please let me
> know. Any other testing or comments are of course welcome.
I think we should instead add it back in omap3 and keep the omap4 as is.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:23:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F5D8F65.7000205@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203092102450.30879@utopia.booyaka.com>
On Saturday 10 March 2012 09:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> The main outstanding question is whether the OMAP4 WUCLKOUT poll should be
> removed to match the v5 changes to the OMAP3 function. Please let me
> know. Any other testing or comments are of course welcome.
I think we should instead add it back in omap3 and keep the omap4 as is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-12 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 15:11 [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` [PATCHv5 1/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: correct enable/disable of daisy io chain Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-10 3:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 3:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-06 15:11 ` [PATCHv5 2/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Move IO Daisychain function to omap3 prm file Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2012-03-06 15:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2012-03-06 16:05 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 16:05 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-10 0:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 0:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-12 5:50 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 5:50 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 9:19 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-12 9:19 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-12 10:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 10:15 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-10 3:50 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 3:50 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-06 15:11 ` [PATCHv5 3/6] ARM: OMAP4 PM: Add IO Daisychain support Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-10 3:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 3:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-12 5:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 5:52 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 6:10 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 6:10 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 6:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-12 6:51 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-06 15:11 ` [PATCHv5 4/6] ARM: OMAP3+: PRM: Enable IO wake up Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-10 4:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 4:00 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-06 15:11 ` [PATCHv5 5/6] ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO Daisychain support via hwmod mux Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-10 4:01 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 4:01 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-06-22 11:45 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-22 11:45 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-22 18:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-06-22 18:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-06 15:11 ` [PATCHv5 6/6] ARM: OMAP3 PM: Remove IO Daisychain control from cpuidle Tero Kristo
2012-03-06 15:11 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-10 4:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 4:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 4:05 ` [PATCHv5 0/6] ARM: OMAP3+: IO daisy chain support fixes Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 4:05 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-12 5:53 ` Rajendra Nayak [this message]
2012-03-12 5:53 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 10:00 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-12 10:00 ` Tero Kristo
2012-03-12 10:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-12 10:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 21:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-10 21:29 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-03-12 5:55 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-03-12 5:55 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F5D8F65.7000205@ti.com \
--to=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.