Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: OMAP: i2c, gpio, spi and regulator DTS updates

["Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>]

On 3/15/2012 12:21 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com>  [120314 16:06]:
>> On 3/14/2012 11:57 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com>   [120314 15:52]:
>>>> Hi Tony,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like Chris Ball just queued  the HSMMC DT stuff from
>>>> Rajendra, so I can add as well the MMC DTS for OMAP3 and OMAP4 as
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>> It is fine for an update?
>>>
>>> Sure, I'm not planning to pull this until after the merge
>>> window.
>>
>> OK, so we will not have the DTS support for the new drivers for 3.4 :-(
>
> Well you said this one has driver dependencies :)

Well, this is not a strong dependency, but it is still better to have 
the driver adapted to use the DTS node.

What is really unfair is that I did remove the DTS from the driver 
series to avoid conflict during merge of the various driver series. So 
next time, I guess I'd rather let the DTS along with the driver, but 
this is really a pity.

>> Well, if you pull that in a lo branch, that will be enough to base
>> the further work on it.
>
> Right we got something like seven branches ready to go for
> early merging after the merge window.. We should have patches
> sitting in linux-next for at least a week before the merge
> window opens.

I know that, but since it is just a bunch of DTS, none of them will 
break anything in linux-next anyway...

>>>> Than I can add as Kevin's patch for twl irq_base removal.
>>>
>>> Hmm I don't follow. That's needed first as a fix for the
>>> merge window?
>>
>> No, not that one. It is just some more cleanup on top of the one
>> Felipe already did in the twl series I've just sent to Samuel.
>> But if you do not plan to pull that series for 3.4, that does not
>> really matter.
>
> Ah OK. In that case feel free to update. Also check if some
> of these can be sent as fixes during the -rc cycle?

No, that should be fine, this one can wait 3.5.

Regards,
Benoit