All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] x86, efi: fix pointer math issue in handle_ramdisks()
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 14:33:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F65F255.5070504@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F639AB0.7010208@zytor.com>



Am 16.03.2012 20:55, schrieb H. Peter Anvin:
> On 03/06/2012 12:44 AM, walter harms wrote:
>>>
>> hi,
>>
>> yep, but i was asking about efi. The basic idea is of cause to map efi_char16_t -> wchar_t
>> and back and make this a prototype for every driver that needs a special charset.
>> That would make it possible to recycle the wcs* interface of libc.
>> IMHO it seems more reasonable than adding one for each (upcoming) type.
>>
> 
> Actually libc and the C standard is going the opposite ways, adding new
> interfaces for UTF-16 and UTF-32.  The wchar_t interface just doesn't
> work very well.
> 

I admit i do not have the problem yet and i do not like the idea adding even more types.
Oh well may i should be happy that someone is actually thinking about this here and not
simply add yet on other hot fix.

re,
 wh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] x86, efi: fix pointer math issue in handle_ramdisks()
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:33:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F65F255.5070504@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F639AB0.7010208@zytor.com>



Am 16.03.2012 20:55, schrieb H. Peter Anvin:
> On 03/06/2012 12:44 AM, walter harms wrote:
>>>
>> hi,
>>
>> yep, but i was asking about efi. The basic idea is of cause to map efi_char16_t -> wchar_t
>> and back and make this a prototype for every driver that needs a special charset.
>> That would make it possible to recycle the wcs* interface of libc.
>> IMHO it seems more reasonable than adding one for each (upcoming) type.
>>
> 
> Actually libc and the C standard is going the opposite ways, adding new
> interfaces for UTF-16 and UTF-32.  The wchar_t interface just doesn't
> work very well.
> 

I admit i do not have the problem yet and i do not like the idea adding even more types.
Oh well may i should be happy that someone is actually thinking about this here and not
simply add yet on other hot fix.

re,
 wh

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-18 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-02 19:01 [patch] x86, efi: fix pointer math issue in handle_ramdisks() Dan Carpenter
2012-03-02 19:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-03  7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-03  7:54   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-03-05 18:06   ` [patch v2] " Dan Carpenter
2012-03-05 18:06     ` Dan Carpenter
2012-03-05 18:42     ` walter harms
2012-03-05 18:42       ` walter harms
2012-03-05 19:33       ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-05 19:33         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-06  8:44         ` walter harms
2012-03-06  8:44           ` walter harms
2012-03-16 19:55           ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-16 19:55             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-03-18 14:33             ` walter harms [this message]
2012-03-18 14:33               ` walter harms
2012-03-16 15:20     ` Matt Fleming
2012-03-16 21:27     ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, efi: Fix " tip-bot for Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F65F255.5070504@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.