All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	'Thomas Abraham' <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
	ben-linux@fluff.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	'Olof Johansson' <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:15:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F73D3D7.1010202@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120328095450.GA23005@sirena.org.uk>

On 03/28/12 02:54, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:24AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
>>>> I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following:
>>>>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>>>> v3.4-for-cjb
>
>>>> If any problems, please kindly let me know.
>
>>> Pushed to mmc-next, thanks.  (I'm expecting that you'll do the merge
>>> to Linus.)
>
>> I was expecting you to merge these patches, but they aren't in the
>> arm-soc tree and haven't been sent to Linus,

(Cc'ed Olof and Arnd)

Chris, Yeah, it is not in arm-soc tree now. Because I sent a pull 
request of samsung-mmc which is including this v3.4-for-cjb but Olof 
wanted to merge only arch/arm/ part for samsung mmc because they are not 
unrelated to the branch, v3.4-for-cjb sent to you. Since I thought the 
branch would be sent to upstream via your tree and you were included in 
the mailing loop, I agreed. So there is no it in arm-soc.

>> and we're in the last few
>> days of the merge window.
>
Yeah...it means not closed yet ;)

>> As a result I'm dropping this tree -- and all of the patches that I
>> have on top of it -- from mmc-next so that I can get a pull request
>> out.  This means that I'm dropping:
>
Hmm, I think, if you're ok, you can send a second pull request to Linus 
for it and actually, it is in linux-next for a long time via mmc and 
samsung tree.

Note, please don't rebase it because its resolution for conflicts is in 
linux-next and I think Linus will use it when happens conflicts...Or I 
can provide new tree on top of latest mainline. But I'm not sure about 
latter.

> If they're already in your tree why not just send them to Linus?  Given
> that everything's in git I don't understand why you'd need Kukjin to
> push them separately or what the benefit of that would be?
>
Yes, I already agreed its merging in the mmc tree :)

> This is all extremely frustrating fromm the contributor point of view.

If any my effort is required, feel free to contact me.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:15:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F73D3D7.1010202@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120328095450.GA23005@sirena.org.uk>

On 03/28/12 02:54, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:24AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Chris Ball wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 21 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
>>>> I created topic branch for this we talked. You can pull that following:
>>>>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
>>>> v3.4-for-cjb
>
>>>> If any problems, please kindly let me know.
>
>>> Pushed to mmc-next, thanks.  (I'm expecting that you'll do the merge
>>> to Linus.)
>
>> I was expecting you to merge these patches, but they aren't in the
>> arm-soc tree and haven't been sent to Linus,

(Cc'ed Olof and Arnd)

Chris, Yeah, it is not in arm-soc tree now. Because I sent a pull 
request of samsung-mmc which is including this v3.4-for-cjb but Olof 
wanted to merge only arch/arm/ part for samsung mmc because they are not 
unrelated to the branch, v3.4-for-cjb sent to you. Since I thought the 
branch would be sent to upstream via your tree and you were included in 
the mailing loop, I agreed. So there is no it in arm-soc.

>> and we're in the last few
>> days of the merge window.
>
Yeah...it means not closed yet ;)

>> As a result I'm dropping this tree -- and all of the patches that I
>> have on top of it -- from mmc-next so that I can get a pull request
>> out.  This means that I'm dropping:
>
Hmm, I think, if you're ok, you can send a second pull request to Linus 
for it and actually, it is in linux-next for a long time via mmc and 
samsung tree.

Note, please don't rebase it because its resolution for conflicts is in 
linux-next and I think Linus will use it when happens conflicts...Or I 
can provide new tree on top of latest mainline. But I'm not sure about 
latter.

> If they're already in your tree why not just send them to Linus?  Given
> that everything's in git I don't understand why you'd need Kukjin to
> push them separately or what the benefit of that would be?
>
Yes, I already agreed its merging in the mmc tree :)

> This is all extremely frustrating fromm the contributor point of view.

If any my effort is required, feel free to contact me.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-29  3:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-31 17:56 [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove usage of clk_type member in platform data Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] arm: exynos4: use 'exynos4-sdhci' as device name for sdhci controllers Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] arm: samsung: remove all uses of clk_type member in sdhci platform data Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: derive transfer width host capability from max_width in " Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 19:12   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-01-31 19:12     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Keep a copy of platform data and use it Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 20:08   ` Grant Likely
2012-01-31 20:08     ` Grant Likely
2012-02-01 18:21   ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-02-01 18:21     ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-27 16:15   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-27 16:15     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-27 16:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-27 16:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30  6:33     ` Viresh Kumar
2012-03-30  6:33       ` Viresh Kumar
2012-03-30 11:36       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30 11:36         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30 15:48         ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-30 15:48           ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-30 18:45           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30 18:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]             ` <201203301845.07534.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-01 11:29               ` Mark Brown
2012-04-01 11:29                 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-13  4:14           ` [PATCH v2] mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings Chris Ball
2012-05-13  4:14             ` Chris Ball
2012-05-13 19:29             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-05-13 19:29               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
     [not found]             ` <871umou38f.fsf_-_-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-13 19:46               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-13 19:46                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-13 20:10                 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-13 20:10                   ` Chris Ball
2012-05-14 19:53                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-14 19:53                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-09 14:48         ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support Chris Ball
2012-04-09 14:48           ` Chris Ball
2012-04-10 21:37         ` Chris Ball
2012-04-10 21:37           ` Chris Ball
2012-02-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add " Kukjin Kim
2012-02-09 13:42   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 21:37   ` Chris Ball
2012-02-11 21:37     ` Chris Ball
2012-02-16 13:04     ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 13:04       ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 13:08       ` Chris Ball
2012-02-16 13:08         ` Chris Ball
2012-02-21 11:37         ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-21 11:37           ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-21 13:17           ` Chris Ball
2012-02-21 13:17             ` Chris Ball
2012-02-22 12:58             ` Mark Brown
2012-02-22 12:58               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-02 20:40               ` Chris Ball
2012-03-02 20:40                 ` Chris Ball
2012-03-03  0:44                 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-03  0:44                   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-03  0:46                   ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to ifdef system suspend Mark Brown
2012-03-03  0:46                     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-03  0:46                     ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Enable runtime power management Mark Brown
2012-03-03  0:46                       ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 10:48                       ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05 10:48                         ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05 11:52                         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 11:52                           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06  6:40                           ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-06  6:40                             ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-09  4:57                       ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  4:57                         ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  5:08                       ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  5:08                         ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09 12:26                         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-09 12:26                           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 10:24                     ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to ifdef system suspend Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05 10:24                       ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-09  4:56                     ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  4:56                       ` Chris Ball
2012-03-27 15:50             ` [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support Chris Ball
2012-03-27 15:50               ` Chris Ball
2012-03-28  9:54               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28  9:54                 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-29  3:15                 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
2012-03-29  3:15                   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-04-01  1:12                   ` Chris Ball
2012-04-01  1:12                     ` Chris Ball
2012-04-02 19:08                     ` Kukjin Kim
2012-04-02 19:08                       ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F73D3D7.1010202@samsung.com \
    --to=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.