All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kgene.kim@samsung.com" <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
	"ben-linux@fluff.org" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:48:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqbhx8pk.fsf@laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203301136.05038.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:36:04 +0000")

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > These bindings came up in a discussion IRC today. I think it's rather bad that
>> > we can't agree on a common way to name the properties for mmc. We have
>> > bindings being proposed or already included from Anton, Stephen, Shawn,
>> > Rajendra, Viresh, Lee and Thomas. Almost all of them define GPIO pins
>> > for card detect and write protect, as well properties to define the bus
>> > width and high-speed modes, but we seem to have almost as many different
>> > definitions of these as we have drivers.
>> > 
>> > Can we please come up with a common binding for these?
>> 
>> Is there any progress on this? Sorry i wasn't following all mails.
>> How should i progress for sdhci-spear?
>
> No progress so far. I would suggest we apply the patch below to unify
> the bindings we have. I tried to minimize the impact by picking the most
> common version for each property, but if we know about devices that would
> get broken by this, we may have to be more careful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks very much for doing this -- I'll be happy to take the patch in
mmc-next once you get time to post a v2 covering Stephen Warren's review
comments (and adding "max-frequency" to the document, I guess).

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cjb@laptop.org (Chris Ball)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 6/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 10:48:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqbhx8pk.fsf@laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203301136.05038.arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:36:04 +0000")

Hi Arnd,

On Fri, Mar 30 2012, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 30 March 2012, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 3/27/2012 9:49 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > These bindings came up in a discussion IRC today. I think it's rather bad that
>> > we can't agree on a common way to name the properties for mmc. We have
>> > bindings being proposed or already included from Anton, Stephen, Shawn,
>> > Rajendra, Viresh, Lee and Thomas. Almost all of them define GPIO pins
>> > for card detect and write protect, as well properties to define the bus
>> > width and high-speed modes, but we seem to have almost as many different
>> > definitions of these as we have drivers.
>> > 
>> > Can we please come up with a common binding for these?
>> 
>> Is there any progress on this? Sorry i wasn't following all mails.
>> How should i progress for sdhci-spear?
>
> No progress so far. I would suggest we apply the patch below to unify
> the bindings we have. I tried to minimize the impact by picking the most
> common version for each property, but if we know about devices that would
> get broken by this, we may have to be more careful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Thanks very much for doing this -- I'll be happy to take the patch in
mmc-next once you get time to post a v2 covering Stephen Warren's review
comments (and adding "max-frequency" to the document, I guess).

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@laptop.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-09 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-31 17:56 [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Remove usage of clk_type member in platform data Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] arm: exynos4: use 'exynos4-sdhci' as device name for sdhci controllers Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] arm: samsung: remove all uses of clk_type member in sdhci platform data Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: derive transfer width host capability from max_width in " Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 19:12   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-01-31 19:12     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Keep a copy of platform data and use it Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 17:56   ` Thomas Abraham
2012-01-31 20:08   ` Grant Likely
2012-01-31 20:08     ` Grant Likely
2012-02-01 18:21   ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-02-01 18:21     ` Karol Lewandowski
2012-03-27 16:15   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-27 16:15     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-27 16:19   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-27 16:19     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30  6:33     ` Viresh Kumar
2012-03-30  6:33       ` Viresh Kumar
2012-03-30 11:36       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30 11:36         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30 15:48         ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-30 15:48           ` Stephen Warren
2012-03-30 18:45           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-30 18:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]             ` <201203301845.07534.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-01 11:29               ` Mark Brown
2012-04-01 11:29                 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-13  4:14           ` [PATCH v2] mmc: dt: Consolidate DT bindings Chris Ball
2012-05-13  4:14             ` Chris Ball
2012-05-13 19:29             ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-05-13 19:29               ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
     [not found]             ` <871umou38f.fsf_-_-2X9k7bc8m7Mdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-05-13 19:46               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-13 19:46                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-13 20:10                 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-13 20:10                   ` Chris Ball
2012-05-14 19:53                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-14 19:53                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-09 14:48         ` Chris Ball [this message]
2012-04-09 14:48           ` [PATCH v3 6/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Add device tree support Chris Ball
2012-04-10 21:37         ` Chris Ball
2012-04-10 21:37           ` Chris Ball
2012-02-09 13:42 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add " Kukjin Kim
2012-02-09 13:42   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-11 21:37   ` Chris Ball
2012-02-11 21:37     ` Chris Ball
2012-02-16 13:04     ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 13:04       ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-16 13:08       ` Chris Ball
2012-02-16 13:08         ` Chris Ball
2012-02-21 11:37         ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-21 11:37           ` Kukjin Kim
2012-02-21 13:17           ` Chris Ball
2012-02-21 13:17             ` Chris Ball
2012-02-22 12:58             ` Mark Brown
2012-02-22 12:58               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-02 20:40               ` Chris Ball
2012-03-02 20:40                 ` Chris Ball
2012-03-03  0:44                 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-03  0:44                   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-03  0:46                   ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to ifdef system suspend Mark Brown
2012-03-03  0:46                     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-03  0:46                     ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Enable runtime power management Mark Brown
2012-03-03  0:46                       ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 10:48                       ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05 10:48                         ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05 11:52                         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 11:52                           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-06  6:40                           ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-06  6:40                             ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-09  4:57                       ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  4:57                         ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  5:08                       ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  5:08                         ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09 12:26                         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-09 12:26                           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-05 10:24                     ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Use CONFIG_PM_SLEEP to ifdef system suspend Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-05 10:24                       ` Jaehoon Chung
2012-03-09  4:56                     ` Chris Ball
2012-03-09  4:56                       ` Chris Ball
2012-03-27 15:50             ` [PATCH v3 0/6] mmc: sdhci-s3c: Rework platform data and add device tree support Chris Ball
2012-03-27 15:50               ` Chris Ball
2012-03-28  9:54               ` Mark Brown
2012-03-28  9:54                 ` Mark Brown
2012-03-29  3:15                 ` Kukjin Kim
2012-03-29  3:15                   ` Kukjin Kim
2012-04-01  1:12                   ` Chris Ball
2012-04-01  1:12                     ` Chris Ball
2012-04-02 19:08                     ` Kukjin Kim
2012-04-02 19:08                       ` Kukjin Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pqbhx8pk.fsf@laptop.org \
    --to=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=rnayak@ti.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas.abraham@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.