* should the dev docs match the dev yocto source?
@ 2012-04-04 9:29 Robert P. J. Day
2012-04-04 12:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-04-04 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yocto discussion list
just noticed that BSP guide suggests 3.0 is the preferred linux
kernel, while the source itself is now up to 3.2. should those match?
this is for *development* streams of both.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: should the dev docs match the dev yocto source?
2012-04-04 9:29 should the dev docs match the dev yocto source? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2012-04-04 12:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-04-04 12:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-04-04 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On 12-04-04 05:29 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> just noticed that BSP guide suggests 3.0 is the preferred linux
> kernel, while the source itself is now up to 3.2. should those match?
> this is for *development* streams of both.
Not necessarily. It depends on the target. We haven't moved everything
to 3.2 yet.
It should probably say something more generic that choosing one of the
last two yocto validated kernels is the preferred starting point.
Cheers,
Bruce
>
> rday
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: should the dev docs match the dev yocto source?
2012-04-04 12:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2012-04-04 12:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2012-04-04 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Yocto discussion list
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 12-04-04 05:29 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > just noticed that BSP guide suggests 3.0 is the preferred linux
> > kernel, while the source itself is now up to 3.2. should those match?
> > this is for *development* streams of both.
>
> Not necessarily. It depends on the target. We haven't moved everything
> to 3.2 yet.
>
> It should probably say something more generic that choosing one of the
> last two yocto validated kernels is the preferred starting point.
understood. i was just looking at the part of the BSP guide using
meta-crownbay as an example, and it kept referring to 3.0 when the
development version is already up to 3.2. someone else can decide if
that's worth syncing up, given that the 3.0 content is still there.
not a big deal.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-04 12:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-04 9:29 should the dev docs match the dev yocto source? Robert P. J. Day
2012-04-04 12:46 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-04-04 12:54 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.