From: Archit Taneja <a0393947@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: tomi.valkeinen@ti.com, paul@pwsan.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4: DSS hwmods: Add OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE to all DSS L3 slave interfaces
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:21:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F87E924.5040601@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F87E72A.2050104@ti.com>
On Friday 13 April 2012 02:13 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 4/13/2012 10:01 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> The clock for all DSS L3 slave interfaces had been recently changed to
>> "dss_fck" from "l3_div_ck". "dss_fck" is an optional clock in DSS
>> clock domain
>> which can't autoidle when enabled.
>>
>> Add OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE flag to all the L3 slave interfaces used by DSS
>> hwmods so
>> that clock is explicitly enabled and disabled by software. Without this,
>> "dss_fck" would be left as enabled and the OMAP4 device won't idle
>> even when
>> DSS is not in use.
>
> Yeah, that was done on purpose with Tomi knowning well that limitation.
>
> The issue was mainly due to the lack of proper parent / child
> relationship between the DSS (the whole subsystem) and the DSS children
> at that time.
>
> I think that Tomi posted a series to fix that for 3.4. So if we ensure
> that every DSS IPs are children of the DSS, then pm_runtime will always
> ensure that the DSS will be enabled each time a submodule is used.
>
> So the right fix is to put back the proper iclk (l3_div) to the DSS
> instead of the dss_fck.
Ok, I get it now. Tomi's patch series ensured the parent-child
dependency, but they didn't switch the iclks back to l3_div, I guess
that should be a part of the series too.
Thanks,
Archit
>
> The current OMAP4 DSS clock setup is clearly a hack that should be fixed.
>
> Regards,
> Benoit
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: a0393947@ti.com (Archit Taneja)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4: DSS hwmods: Add OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE to all DSS L3 slave interfaces
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:21:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F87E924.5040601@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F87E72A.2050104@ti.com>
On Friday 13 April 2012 02:13 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 4/13/2012 10:01 AM, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> The clock for all DSS L3 slave interfaces had been recently changed to
>> "dss_fck" from "l3_div_ck". "dss_fck" is an optional clock in DSS
>> clock domain
>> which can't autoidle when enabled.
>>
>> Add OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE flag to all the L3 slave interfaces used by DSS
>> hwmods so
>> that clock is explicitly enabled and disabled by software. Without this,
>> "dss_fck" would be left as enabled and the OMAP4 device won't idle
>> even when
>> DSS is not in use.
>
> Yeah, that was done on purpose with Tomi knowning well that limitation.
>
> The issue was mainly due to the lack of proper parent / child
> relationship between the DSS (the whole subsystem) and the DSS children
> at that time.
>
> I think that Tomi posted a series to fix that for 3.4. So if we ensure
> that every DSS IPs are children of the DSS, then pm_runtime will always
> ensure that the DSS will be enabled each time a submodule is used.
>
> So the right fix is to put back the proper iclk (l3_div) to the DSS
> instead of the dss_fck.
Ok, I get it now. Tomi's patch series ensured the parent-child
dependency, but they didn't switch the iclks back to l3_div, I guess
that should be a part of the series too.
Thanks,
Archit
>
> The current OMAP4 DSS clock setup is clearly a hack that should be fixed.
>
> Regards,
> Benoit
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-13 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 8:01 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2PLUS: DSS hwmod fixes Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 8:01 ` Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 8:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2/3: VENC hwmods: Remove OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE flag from VENC slave interface Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 8:01 ` Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 11:20 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-13 11:20 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-13 11:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-13 11:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-13 11:37 ` Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 11:37 ` Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 8:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP4: DSS hwmods: Add OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE to all DSS L3 slave interfaces Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 8:01 ` Archit Taneja
2012-04-13 8:43 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-13 8:43 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-13 8:51 ` Archit Taneja [this message]
2012-04-13 8:51 ` Archit Taneja
2012-05-04 6:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-05-04 6:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-05-04 7:03 ` Archit Taneja
2012-05-04 7:03 ` Archit Taneja
2012-05-04 8:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-05-04 8:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F87E924.5040601@ti.com \
--to=a0393947@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.