From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
To: Huang Shijie <b32955@freescale.com>
Cc: "shawn.guo@linaro.org" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"dedekind1@gmail.com" <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add gpmi-nand dt support for mx6q and mx28
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:10:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F97A351.1090505@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F979EF2.8050904@freescale.com>
On 25.04.2012 08:51, Huang Shijie wrote:
> 于 2012年04月25日 14:41, Dirk Behme 写道:
>> Hi Huang Shijie,
>>
>> On 25.04.2012 05:06, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>> The mx6q-arm2 and imx28evk have already support the device tree now.
>>> So i decide to add the gpmi-nand dt support to them.
>>>
>>> The mx23 does not support the device tree now. I will add the gpmi dt
>>> support
>>> when it is ready.
>>>
>>> Test this patch set on both MX6Q(arm2) and mx28(evk).
>>>
>>> v1 --> v2
>>> [1] merge the gpmi/bch device node into one node.
>>> [2] add partitions support.
>>> [3] misc
>>>
>>> Huang Shijie (3):
>>> mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28
>>> ARM: mx28: add gpmi-nand dt support
>>> ARM: mx6q: add gpmi-nand dt support
>> For which kernel are these 3 patches? I tried to apply them on top of
>> 3.4-rc4 and got a lot of rejects.
>>
> They are based on 3.4-rc4. but I also applied some mxs-dma patches.
>
> Which one cause the rejects?
Could you kindly try to apply "mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for
mx6q and mx28" on a clean 3.4-rc4?
Many thanks
Dirk
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] add gpmi-nand dt support for mx6q and mx28
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:10:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F97A351.1090505@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F979EF2.8050904@freescale.com>
On 25.04.2012 08:51, Huang Shijie wrote:
> ? 2012?04?25? 14:41, Dirk Behme ??:
>> Hi Huang Shijie,
>>
>> On 25.04.2012 05:06, Huang Shijie wrote:
>>> The mx6q-arm2 and imx28evk have already support the device tree now.
>>> So i decide to add the gpmi-nand dt support to them.
>>>
>>> The mx23 does not support the device tree now. I will add the gpmi dt
>>> support
>>> when it is ready.
>>>
>>> Test this patch set on both MX6Q(arm2) and mx28(evk).
>>>
>>> v1 --> v2
>>> [1] merge the gpmi/bch device node into one node.
>>> [2] add partitions support.
>>> [3] misc
>>>
>>> Huang Shijie (3):
>>> mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for mx6q and mx28
>>> ARM: mx28: add gpmi-nand dt support
>>> ARM: mx6q: add gpmi-nand dt support
>> For which kernel are these 3 patches? I tried to apply them on top of
>> 3.4-rc4 and got a lot of rejects.
>>
> They are based on 3.4-rc4. but I also applied some mxs-dma patches.
>
> Which one cause the rejects?
Could you kindly try to apply "mtd: gpmi: add device tree support for
mx6q and mx28" on a clean 3.4-rc4?
Many thanks
Dirk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-25 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-25 3:06 [PATCH v2 0/3] add gpmi-nand dt support for mx6q and mx28 Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: gpmi: add device tree " Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-01 7:49 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-01 7:49 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-02 2:50 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-02 2:50 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-02 5:21 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-02 5:21 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-02 2:52 ` Huang Shijie
2012-05-02 2:52 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: mx28: add gpmi-nand dt support Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: mx6q: " Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 3:06 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 6:41 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] add gpmi-nand dt support for mx6q and mx28 Dirk Behme
2012-04-25 6:41 ` Dirk Behme
2012-04-25 6:51 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 6:51 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 7:10 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2012-04-25 7:10 ` Dirk Behme
2012-04-25 7:19 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-25 7:19 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-28 12:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-28 12:00 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-04-28 13:31 ` Huang Shijie
2012-04-28 13:31 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F97A351.1090505@de.bosch.com \
--to=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=b32955@freescale.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.