From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
sandeen@sandeen.net, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs()
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAD261D.80102@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAD25B3.3050802@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
On 05/11/2012 04:44 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 04:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 05/11/2012 03:49 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> The number of bio_get_nr_vecs() is passed down via bio_alloc() to
>>> bvec_alloc_bs(), which fails the bio allocation if
>>> nr_iovecs> BIO_MAX_PAGES. For the underlying caller this causes an
>>> unexpected bio allocation failure.
>>> Limiting to queue_max_segments() is not sufficient, as max_segments
>>> also might be very large.
>>>
>>> bvec_alloc_bs(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, ) => NULL when nr_iovecs> BIO_MAX_PAGES
>>> bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, ...)
>>> bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, nvecs)
>>> xfs_alloc_ioend_bio()
>>
>> Thanks, looks sane. Applied.
>>
>
> Great, thanks! Should we CC linux-stable for commit
> 5abebfdd02450fa1349daacf242e70b3736581e3 and this one, as I got a hard
> kernel panic?
Yes, that's a good idea. I've ammended the commit now to include stable.
--
Jens Axboe
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, sandeen@sandeen.net,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs()
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FAD261D.80102@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAD25B3.3050802@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
On 05/11/2012 04:44 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 04:36 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 05/11/2012 03:49 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> The number of bio_get_nr_vecs() is passed down via bio_alloc() to
>>> bvec_alloc_bs(), which fails the bio allocation if
>>> nr_iovecs> BIO_MAX_PAGES. For the underlying caller this causes an
>>> unexpected bio allocation failure.
>>> Limiting to queue_max_segments() is not sufficient, as max_segments
>>> also might be very large.
>>>
>>> bvec_alloc_bs(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, ) => NULL when nr_iovecs> BIO_MAX_PAGES
>>> bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, ...)
>>> bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, nvecs)
>>> xfs_alloc_ioend_bio()
>>
>> Thanks, looks sane. Applied.
>>
>
> Great, thanks! Should we CC linux-stable for commit
> 5abebfdd02450fa1349daacf242e70b3736581e3 and this one, as I got a hard
> kernel panic?
Yes, that's a good idea. I've ammended the commit now to include stable.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-11 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 15:45 kernel panic / NULL pointer dereference Bernd Schubert
2012-05-10 16:17 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-05-10 16:43 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-10 16:43 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 13:49 ` [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs() Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 13:49 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 14:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-05-11 14:06 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-05-11 14:31 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 14:31 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2012-05-11 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2012-05-11 16:29 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-05-11 16:29 ` Jeff Moyer
2012-05-11 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2012-05-11 14:36 ` Jens Axboe
2012-05-11 14:44 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 14:44 ` Bernd Schubert
2012-05-11 14:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2012-05-11 14:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FAD261D.80102@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.