From: ludovic.desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com,
ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:28:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB54366.80409@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k40b3ris.fsf@laptop.org>
Hi Chris,
Le 05/17/2012 02:45 PM, Chris Ball a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 16 2012, ludovic.desroches@atmel.com wrote:
>> From: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>
>> at91-mci is deprecated since atmel-mci can deal with all chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++++++++++
>> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 7 +++++--
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> index 03ca210..8b4aef2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> @@ -539,3 +539,14 @@ When: 3.6
>> Why: setitimer is not returning -EFAULT if user pointer is NULL. This
>> violates the spec.
>> Who: Sasikantha Babu<sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
>> +
>> +----------------------------
>> +
>> +What: at91-mci driver ("CONFIG_MMC_AT91")
>> +When: 3.7
>> +Why: There two mci drivers: at91-mci and atmel-mci. The PDC support was
> ^ are
>
>> + added to atmel-mci as a first step to support more chips. Then
>> + at91-mci was kept only for old IP versions (on at91rm9200 and
>> + at91sam9261). The support of these IP versions has just been added
>> + so atmel-mci can be used for all chips.
>> +Who: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> index 2bc06e7..f150591 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> @@ -278,10 +278,13 @@ choice
>> Choose which driver to use for the Atmel MCI Silicon
>>
>> config MMC_AT91
>> - tristate "AT91 SD/MMC Card Interface support"
>> + tristate "AT91 SD/MMC Card Interface support (DEPRECATED)"
>> depends on ARCH_AT91
>> help
>> - This selects the AT91 MCI controller.
>> + This selects the AT91 MCI controller. This driver will be
>> + remove soon (for more information have a look to
> ^ removed
>> + Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt). Please use
>> + MMC_ATMEL_MCI.
>>
>> If unsure, say N.
Sorry for the typo, do you want a new patch or is ok?
>
> Seems like I should take this patch 2/2, and then someone else should
> merge 1/2?
Yes, Nicolas would probably take patch 2/2.
Regards
Ludovic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:28:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB54366.80409@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k40b3ris.fsf@laptop.org>
Hi Chris,
Le 05/17/2012 02:45 PM, Chris Ball a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 16 2012, ludovic.desroches at atmel.com wrote:
>> From: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>>
>> at91-mci is deprecated since atmel-mci can deal with all chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++++++++++
>> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 7 +++++--
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> index 03ca210..8b4aef2 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
>> @@ -539,3 +539,14 @@ When: 3.6
>> Why: setitimer is not returning -EFAULT if user pointer is NULL. This
>> violates the spec.
>> Who: Sasikantha Babu<sasikanth.v19@gmail.com>
>> +
>> +----------------------------
>> +
>> +What: at91-mci driver ("CONFIG_MMC_AT91")
>> +When: 3.7
>> +Why: There two mci drivers: at91-mci and atmel-mci. The PDC support was
> ^ are
>
>> + added to atmel-mci as a first step to support more chips. Then
>> + at91-mci was kept only for old IP versions (on at91rm9200 and
>> + at91sam9261). The support of these IP versions has just been added
>> + so atmel-mci can be used for all chips.
>> +Who: Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> index 2bc06e7..f150591 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> @@ -278,10 +278,13 @@ choice
>> Choose which driver to use for the Atmel MCI Silicon
>>
>> config MMC_AT91
>> - tristate "AT91 SD/MMC Card Interface support"
>> + tristate "AT91 SD/MMC Card Interface support (DEPRECATED)"
>> depends on ARCH_AT91
>> help
>> - This selects the AT91 MCI controller.
>> + This selects the AT91 MCI controller. This driver will be
>> + remove soon (for more information have a look to
> ^ removed
>> + Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt). Please use
>> + MMC_ATMEL_MCI.
>>
>> If unsure, say N.
Sorry for the typo, do you want a new patch or is ok?
>
> Seems like I should take this patch 2/2, and then someone else should
> merge 1/2?
Yes, Nicolas would probably take patch 2/2.
Regards
Ludovic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 15:51 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: at91: allow all boards to use atmel-mci driver ludovic.desroches
2012-05-16 15:51 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-16 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: add atmel-mci support for chips and boards which can use it ludovic.desroches
2012-05-16 15:51 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-21 10:17 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-21 10:17 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-16 15:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated ludovic.desroches
2012-05-16 15:51 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-17 12:45 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 12:45 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 18:28 ` ludovic.desroches [this message]
2012-05-17 18:28 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-17 18:36 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 18:36 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 18:40 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-17 18:40 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-21 10:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-21 10:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-21 10:23 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: add atmel-mci support for chips and boards which can use it ludovic.desroches
2012-05-21 10:23 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-21 10:31 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-21 10:31 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-28 7:41 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-28 7:41 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-29 10:56 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-29 10:56 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-29 15:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-29 15:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB54366.80409@atmel.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.