From: ludovic.desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
To: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
"ludovic.desroches" <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB54612.7090705@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqa21wow.fsf@laptop.org>
Le 05/17/2012 08:36 PM, Chris Ball a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 17 2012, ludovic.desroches wrote:
>>>> + remove soon (for more information have a look to
>>> ^ removed
>>>> + Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt). Please use
>>>> + MMC_ATMEL_MCI.
>>>>
>>>> If unsure, say N.
>>
>> Sorry for the typo, do you want a new patch or is ok?
>
> It's okay, I've fixed it up here.
>
>>> Seems like I should take this patch 2/2, and then someone else should
>>> merge 1/2?
>>
>> Yes, Nicolas would probably take patch 2/2.
>
> I think you must mean that Nicolas takes 1/2 (the arch/arm/ patches).
> Assuming you do, that's fine and I've pushed 2/2 to mmc-next for 3.5 now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
Fine. Thanks
Ludovic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ludovic.desroches@atmel.com (ludovic.desroches)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB54612.7090705@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pqa21wow.fsf@laptop.org>
Le 05/17/2012 08:36 PM, Chris Ball a ?crit :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 17 2012, ludovic.desroches wrote:
>>>> + remove soon (for more information have a look to
>>> ^ removed
>>>> + Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt). Please use
>>>> + MMC_ATMEL_MCI.
>>>>
>>>> If unsure, say N.
>>
>> Sorry for the typo, do you want a new patch or is ok?
>
> It's okay, I've fixed it up here.
>
>>> Seems like I should take this patch 2/2, and then someone else should
>>> merge 1/2?
>>
>> Yes, Nicolas would probably take patch 2/2.
>
> I think you must mean that Nicolas takes 1/2 (the arch/arm/ patches).
> Assuming you do, that's fine and I've pushed 2/2 to mmc-next for 3.5 now.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
Fine. Thanks
Ludovic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 15:51 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: at91: allow all boards to use atmel-mci driver ludovic.desroches
2012-05-16 15:51 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-16 15:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: at91: add atmel-mci support for chips and boards which can use it ludovic.desroches
2012-05-16 15:51 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-21 10:17 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-21 10:17 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-16 15:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: at91-mci: this driver is now deprecated ludovic.desroches
2012-05-16 15:51 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-17 12:45 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 12:45 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 18:28 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-17 18:28 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-17 18:36 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 18:36 ` Chris Ball
2012-05-17 18:40 ` ludovic.desroches [this message]
2012-05-17 18:40 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-21 10:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-21 10:19 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-21 10:23 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: add atmel-mci support for chips and boards which can use it ludovic.desroches
2012-05-21 10:23 ` ludovic.desroches at atmel.com
2012-05-21 10:31 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-21 10:31 ` ludovic.desroches
2012-05-28 7:41 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-28 7:41 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-29 10:56 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-29 10:56 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-05-29 15:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-05-29 15:57 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB54612.7090705@atmel.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.