All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Asit K Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Arjan Dan De Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 23:35:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCE2747.3050308@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206042203590.3086@ionos>

Hi Thomas,
	It's a great idea to use state machine to implement cpu online/offline.
Actually we are trying to split the cpu online/offline flow into several stages
so we could do error recover easily when hot-plugging physical processors.
	Thanks!
	Gerry

On 06/05/2012 04:11 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2012, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> 
>> From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
>>
>> Since offline CPU is in wmait or hlt if mwait feature is not available, it can
>> be waken up by writing to monitored memory range or via nmi.
>>
>> Compared to current INIT, INIT, STARTUP wake up sequence, waking up offline CPU
>> is faster via wmait or nmi. This is especially useful when offline CPU for
>> power saving and shorter waking up time is desired. On one tested desktop
>> machine, waking up time via mwait or nmi is reduced to 23% of waking up time
>> via INIT. Waking up time is measured from the beginning of store_online() to
>> the beginning of cpu_idle() after the CPU is waken up.
>>
>> Waking up offline CPU via mwait or nmi is also useful to support BSP offline/
>> online because offline BSP can not be waken up by the INIT's sequence. The BSP
>> offline/online patchset will be sent out seperately.
> 
> I understand what you are trying to do, though I completely disagree
> with the solution.
> 
> The main problem of the current hotplug code is that it is an all or
> nothing approach. You have to tear down the whole thing completely
> instead of just taking it out of the usable set of cpus.
> 
> I'm working on a proper state machine driven online/offline sequence,
> where you can put the cpu into an intermediate state which avoids
> bringing it down completely. This is enough to get the full
> powersaving benefits w/o having to go through all the synchronization
> states of a full online/offline. That will shorten the onlining time
> of an previously offlined cpu to almost nothing.
> 
> I really want to avoid adding more bandaids to the hotplug code before
> we have sorted out the existing horror.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04 18:17 [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt: Add wakeup_cpu_via_init kernel parameter help Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/head_32.S/head_64.S: Kernel entry code after waking up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/smpboot.c: Wake " Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:58   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-04 19:35     ` Yu, Fenghua
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/apic_flat_64.c: Wakeup function in apic calls mwait or nmi method Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/x2apic_cluster.c: Wakeup function in x2apic_cluster " Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/x2apic_phys.c: Wakeup function in x2apic_phys " Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 20:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-04 20:18   ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-04 22:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-04 20:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05  0:40     ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-05  1:23       ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05  7:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 14:17         ` Alan Stern
2012-06-05 15:27           ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05  7:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 16:02         ` Yu, Fenghua
2012-06-05 16:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 16:18             ` Yu, Fenghua
2012-06-05 16:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 17:44                 ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-05 17:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:43                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 19:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:49                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:51                         ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05 19:52                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 20:47                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 21:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 22:09                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-06  8:23                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:30                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:40                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 22:12                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06  8:40                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:42                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:44                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 15:46                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 23:20                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-08  9:20                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:43                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:41                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 15:23                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-06 15:48                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 15:49                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 16:59                                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05 21:29                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-05 21:37                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 22:00                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 12:17                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:43                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-05 19:51                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 20:58                       ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-05 21:15                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 21:33                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 23:13                             ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06  1:52                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05 18:07                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:54                     ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-05 19:56                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05  9:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 13:41         ` [PATCH] kthread: Implement park/unpark facility Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 14:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 14:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07  0:04             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-10  5:40           ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-11  9:26             ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-12  0:23               ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-05 15:35   ` Jiang Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCE2747.3050308@gmail.com \
    --to=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.