All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:51:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FCE6341.3080105@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338925756.2749.36.camel@twins>

On 6/5/2012 12:49 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 21:43 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Vs. the interrupt/timer/other crap madness:
>>
>>  - We really don't want to have an interrupt balancer in the kernel
>>    again, but we need a mechanism to prevent the user space balancer
>>    trainwreck from ruining the power saving party.
> 
> What's wrong with having an interrupt balancer tied to the scheduler
> which optimistically tries to avoid interrupting nohz/isolated/idle
> cpus?

ideally threaded interrupts are like this.. we really should push for
more usage of such and it all falls into place



  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-05 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-04 18:17 [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt: Add wakeup_cpu_via_init kernel parameter help Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/head_32.S/head_64.S: Kernel entry code after waking up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/smpboot.c: Wake " Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:58   ` Suresh Siddha
2012-06-04 19:35     ` Yu, Fenghua
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/apic_flat_64.c: Wakeup function in apic calls mwait or nmi method Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/x2apic_cluster.c: Wakeup function in x2apic_cluster " Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/x2apic_phys.c: Wakeup function in x2apic_phys " Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 18:17 ` Fenghua Yu
2012-06-04 20:11 ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-04 20:18   ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-04 22:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-04 20:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05  0:40     ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-05  1:23       ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05  7:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 14:17         ` Alan Stern
2012-06-05 15:27           ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05  7:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 16:02         ` Yu, Fenghua
2012-06-05 16:09           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 16:18             ` Yu, Fenghua
2012-06-05 16:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 17:44                 ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-05 17:50                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:43                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 19:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:49                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:51                         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2012-06-05 19:52                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 20:47                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 21:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 22:09                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-06  8:23                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:30                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:40                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 22:12                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06  8:40                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:42                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:44                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 15:46                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 23:20                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-08  9:20                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06  8:43                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:41                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 15:23                                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-06 15:48                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 15:49                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 16:59                                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05 21:29                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-05 21:37                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 22:00                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-06 12:17                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:43                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-05 19:51                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 20:58                       ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-05 21:15                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 21:33                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 23:13                             ` Andi Kleen
2012-06-06  1:52                               ` Arjan van de Ven
2012-06-05 18:07                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 19:54                     ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-05 19:56                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05  9:36       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 13:41         ` [PATCH] kthread: Implement park/unpark facility Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 14:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-05 14:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-07  0:04             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-10  5:40           ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-11  9:26             ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-12  0:23               ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-05 15:35   ` [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait or nmi Jiang Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FCE6341.3080105@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.