All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: cjb@laptop.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
	rob.herring@calxeda.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
	ulf.hansson@stericsson.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	aletes.xgr@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:23:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDF4543.6090009@wwwdotorg.org>

On 06/18/2012 05:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Thanks for the hint! I previously also suspected sth. like this but
>> didn't find it in v3.5-rc3. In broonie's sound.git for-next, I now
>> finally found it.
>>
>> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>
>> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would
>> be the correct one to build on top?
> 
> I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your
> patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but
> if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this.

I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the
correct one to patch against? Or sth. better suited?

Thanks in advance,

Roland

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: stigge@antcom.de (Roland Stigge)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 17:23:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDF4543.6090009@wwwdotorg.org>

On 06/18/2012 05:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Thanks for the hint! I previously also suspected sth. like this but
>> didn't find it in v3.5-rc3. In broonie's sound.git for-next, I now
>> finally found it.
>>
>> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>
>> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would
>> be the correct one to build on top?
> 
> I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your
> patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but
> if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this.

I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the
correct one to patch against? Or sth. better suited?

Thanks in advance,

Roland

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-18 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-17 10:11 [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: mmci.c: Defer probe() in case of yet uninitialized GPIOs Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11   ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 16:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-17 16:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-17 18:01   ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:01     ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: mmci.c: Remove wrong error handling of gpio 0 Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11   ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 18:06   ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:06     ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:04 ` [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:04   ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-18  2:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18  2:06   ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18  2:06   ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18  9:19   ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18  9:19     ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 11:24     ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 11:24       ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 14:50     ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 14:50       ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:08       ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:08         ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:12         ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:12           ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:23           ` Roland Stigge [this message]
2012-06-18 15:23             ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:45             ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:45               ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 16:40               ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 16:40                 ` Roland Stigge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de \
    --to=stigge@antcom.de \
    --cc=aletes.xgr@gmail.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.