From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: cjb@laptop.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca,
rob.herring@calxeda.com, rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk,
ulf.hansson@stericsson.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
aletes.xgr@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:45:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF4D14.50203@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de>
On 06/18/2012 09:23 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 05:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> Thanks for the hint! I previously also suspected sth. like this but
>>> didn't find it in v3.5-rc3. In broonie's sound.git for-next, I now
>>> finally found it.
>>>
>>> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>
>>> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would
>>> be the correct one to build on top?
>>
>> I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your
>> patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but
>> if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this.
>
> I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the
> correct one to patch against?
Yes, that's the one. Thanks.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:45:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FDF4D14.50203@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FDF47D8.9000309@antcom.de>
On 06/18/2012 09:23 AM, Roland Stigge wrote:
> On 06/18/2012 05:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> Thanks for the hint! I previously also suspected sth. like this but
>>> didn't find it in v3.5-rc3. In broonie's sound.git for-next, I now
>>> finally found it.
>>>
>>> Should be easy to fix (replacing the if (... == -ENODEV) to -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>
>>> Will you provide patches as signalled, of should I? Which branch would
>>> be the correct one to build on top?
>>
>> I'm happy either way. It'd probably be best to roll the change into your
>> patch/series so you can manage all the dependencies in one series, but
>> if you can't for some reason, I'm happy to provide a patch for this.
>
> I should be able ;-) - is broonie's sound.git, branch for-next the
> correct one to patch against?
Yes, that's the one. Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-18 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-17 10:11 [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: mmci.c: Defer probe() in case of yet uninitialized GPIOs Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 16:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-17 16:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-06-17 18:01 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:01 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 10:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: mmci.c: Remove wrong error handling of gpio 0 Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 10:11 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-17 18:06 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:06 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:04 ` [PATCH] gpio: of_get_named_gpio_flags() return -EPROBE_DEFER if GPIO not yet available Linus Walleij
2012-06-17 18:04 ` Linus Walleij
2012-06-18 2:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 2:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 2:06 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 9:19 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 9:19 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 11:24 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 11:24 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 14:50 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 14:50 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:08 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:08 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:12 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:12 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 15:23 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:23 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 15:45 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2012-06-18 15:45 ` Stephen Warren
2012-06-18 16:40 ` Roland Stigge
2012-06-18 16:40 ` Roland Stigge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FDF4D14.50203@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=aletes.xgr@gmail.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=stigge@antcom.de \
--cc=ulf.hansson@stericsson.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.