From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: add local_tlb_flush_kernel_range()
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:35:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEB5267.8000109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627153911.GH17154@phenom.dumpdata.com>
On 06/27/2012 10:39 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:12:56AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>>> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan@kernel.org]
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: add local_tlb_flush_kernel_range()
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 06/27/2012 03:14 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/27/2012 01:53 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/26/2012 01:14 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch adds support for a local_tlb_flush_kernel_range()
>>>>>> function for the x86 arch. This function allows for CPU-local
>>>>>> TLB flushing, potentially using invlpg for single entry flushing,
>>>>>> using an arch independent function name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, we don't matter INVLPG_BREAK_EVEN_PAGES's optimization point is 8 or something.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Different CPU type has different balance point on the invlpg replacing
>>>> flush all. and some CPU never get benefit from invlpg, So, it's better
>>>> to use different value for different CPU, not a fixed
>>>> INVLPG_BREAK_EVEN_PAGES.
>>>
>>> I think it could be another patch as further step and someone who are
>>> very familiar with architecture could do better than.
>>> So I hope it could be merged if it doesn't have real big problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the comment, Alex.
>>
>> Just my opinion, but I have to agree with Alex. Hardcoding
>> behavior that is VERY processor-specific is a bad idea. TLBs should
>> only be messed with when absolutely necessary, not for the
>> convenience of defending an abstraction that is nice-to-have
>> but, in current OS kernel code, unnecessary.
>
> At least put a big fat comment in the patch saying:
> "This is based on research done by Alex, where ...
I can do this.
--
Seth
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: add local_tlb_flush_kernel_range()
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:35:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FEB5267.8000109@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120627153911.GH17154@phenom.dumpdata.com>
On 06/27/2012 10:39 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 08:12:56AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>>> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan@kernel.org]
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: add local_tlb_flush_kernel_range()
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 06/27/2012 03:14 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/27/2012 01:53 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 06/26/2012 01:14 AM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch adds support for a local_tlb_flush_kernel_range()
>>>>>> function for the x86 arch. This function allows for CPU-local
>>>>>> TLB flushing, potentially using invlpg for single entry flushing,
>>>>>> using an arch independent function name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, we don't matter INVLPG_BREAK_EVEN_PAGES's optimization point is 8 or something.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Different CPU type has different balance point on the invlpg replacing
>>>> flush all. and some CPU never get benefit from invlpg, So, it's better
>>>> to use different value for different CPU, not a fixed
>>>> INVLPG_BREAK_EVEN_PAGES.
>>>
>>> I think it could be another patch as further step and someone who are
>>> very familiar with architecture could do better than.
>>> So I hope it could be merged if it doesn't have real big problem.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the comment, Alex.
>>
>> Just my opinion, but I have to agree with Alex. Hardcoding
>> behavior that is VERY processor-specific is a bad idea. TLBs should
>> only be messed with when absolutely necessary, not for the
>> convenience of defending an abstraction that is nice-to-have
>> but, in current OS kernel code, unnecessary.
>
> At least put a big fat comment in the patch saying:
> "This is based on research done by Alex, where ...
I can do this.
--
Seth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-27 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-25 16:14 [PATCH 0/3] zsmalloc: remove x86 dependency Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 16:14 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] zram/zcache: swtich Kconfig dependency from X86 to ZSMALLOC Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 16:14 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 2:37 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 2:37 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 2:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 2:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 2:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 2:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 3:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 3:21 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 15:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 15:40 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 18:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 18:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 18:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 18:52 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 19:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 19:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] zsmalloc: add generic path and remove x86 dependency Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 16:14 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 16:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 16:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 17:10 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 17:10 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 17:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 17:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 18:24 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 18:24 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 23:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-25 23:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-27 5:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 5:28 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 19:09 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 19:09 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-28 0:20 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-28 0:20 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-25 16:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: add local_tlb_flush_kernel_range() Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 16:14 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-25 23:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-25 23:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-26 13:39 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-26 13:39 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 5:53 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 5:53 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 6:14 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-27 6:14 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-27 6:26 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 6:26 ` Minchan Kim
2012-06-27 15:12 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-27 15:12 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-27 15:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 15:39 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-06-27 18:35 ` Seth Jennings [this message]
2012-06-27 18:35 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 18:33 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 18:33 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 21:15 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-27 21:15 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-06-27 21:41 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-27 21:41 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-28 2:03 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-28 2:03 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-28 15:21 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-28 15:21 ` Seth Jennings
2012-06-29 0:19 ` Alex Shi
2012-06-29 0:19 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FEB5267.8000109@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=ngupta@vflare.org \
--cc=rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.