From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@frijolero.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF38EA9.8000709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6VpCUr1v400bNa1R3Ns4S4QVUt-cjq8=XtoJY=U533Cig@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/04/2012 01:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form
> dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can
> easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one
> patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual
> changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use
> to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the
> commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a
> regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it.
There was only one patch.
The second mail was only a "Signed-off-by:", just in case.
> The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed
> upon a while ago, for details see:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2
Thank youuuuu http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Mailing_list_for_regulatory_updates
:-P
> The more information you can provide the better.
I believe I sent enough.
-thanks-
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@frijolero.org>
Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 02:30:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF38EA9.8000709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB=NE6VpCUr1v400bNa1R3Ns4S4QVUt-cjq8=XtoJY=U533Cig@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/04/2012 01:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Please send a new patch and if you are going to convert something form
> dBm to mW then please do that in *one* single patch so that it can
> easily be read what changes you are *actually* making. That is one
> patch to make a conversion in units that will not make any actual
> changes, and then send another patch with all the verbiage you can use
> to explain *why* you want the change you are making. You want the
> commit log to have enough language so that if I forward the patch to a
> regulatory person who has never read a patch they can read it.
There was only one patch.
The second mail was only a "Signed-off-by:", just in case.
> The agreed upon "bar" for quality of regulatory patches was agreed
> upon a while ago, for details see:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=128414096127554&w=2
Thank youuuuu http://wireless.kernel.org/en/developers/Regulatory#Mailing_list_for_regulatory_updates
:-P
> The more information you can provide the better.
I believe I sent enough.
-thanks-
_______________________________________________
wireless-regdb mailing list
wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-04 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-03 21:25 [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for ES (Spain) on 5GHz and 2.4GHz Xose Vazquez Perez
2012-07-03 21:25 ` [wireless-regdb] " Xose Vazquez Perez
2012-07-03 23:47 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2012-07-03 23:47 ` [wireless-regdb] " Xose Vazquez Perez
2012-07-03 23:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-03 23:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-04 0:30 ` Xose Vazquez Perez [this message]
2012-07-04 0:30 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2012-07-04 0:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-04 0:34 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-07-04 0:40 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2012-07-04 0:40 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF38EA9.8000709@gmail.com \
--to=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mcgrof@frijolero.org \
--cc=wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.