All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware
@ 2016-10-21 12:08 Kashyap Desai
  2016-10-21 12:36 ` James Bottomley
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Kashyap Desai @ 2016-10-21 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Bottomley, Sumit Saxena, linux-scsi; +Cc: martin.petersen, thenzl, stable

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:32 PM
> To: Sumit Saxena; linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com; thenzl@redhat.com;
> kashyap.desai@broadcom.com; stable@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE
> command to firmware
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 02:05 -0700, Sumit Saxena wrote:
> > From previous patch we have below changes in v2 - 1.  Updated change
> > log.  Provided more detail in change log.
> > 2.  Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter,
> > we
> >     can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact.
> > 3.  Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE  for JBOD (non Raid) Device to
> > Firmware.
> >
> > Current megaraid_sas driver returns SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE(related to Drive
> > Cache)  command  back to SCSI layer without sending it down to
> > firmware as firmware supposed to take care of flushing disk cache for
> > all drives belongs to Virtual Disk at the time of system
> > reboot/shutdown.
> >
> > We evaluate and understood that for Raid Volume, why driver should not
> > send SYNC_CACHE command to the Firmware.
> > There may be a some reason in past, but now it looks to be not
> > required and we have fixed this issue as part of this patch.
> >
> > Commit- " 02b01e0 [SCSI] megaraid_sas: return sync cache call with
> > success"
> > added the code in driver to return SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE without sending
> > it to firmware back in 2007. Earlier MR was mainly for Virtual Disk,
> > so same code continue for JBOD as well whenever JBOD support was added
> > and it introduced bug that SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE is not passed to FW for
> > JBOD (non Raid disk).
> >
> > But our recent analysis indicates that, From Day-1 MR Firmware always
> > expect Driver to forward SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid disk) to
> > the Firmware.
> > We have fixed this as part of this patch.
> >
> >  - Additional background -
> > There are some instance of MegaRaid FW (E.a Gen2 and Gen2.5 FW) set
> > WCE bit for Virtual Disk but firmware does not reply correct status
> > for SYNCH_CACHE.
> > It is very difficult to find out which Device ID and firmware has
> > capability to manage SYNC_CACHE, so we managed to figure out which are
> > the new firmware (canHandleSyncCache is set in scratch pad register at
> > 0xB4) and use that interface for correct behavior as explained above.
> >
> > E.g Liberator/Thunderbolt MegaRaid FW returns SYNC_CACHE as
> > Unsupported command (this is a firmware bug) and eventually command
> > will be failed to SML.
> > This will cause File system to go Read-only.
> >
> >  - New behavior described -
> >
> > IF application requests SYNCH_CACHE
> >    IF 'JBOD'
> >               Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the FW
> >                FW sends SYNCH_CACHE to drive
> >                FW obtains status from drive and returns same status
> > back to driver
> >    ELSEIF 'VirtualDisk'
> >                IF any FW which supports new API bit called
> > canHandleSyncCache
> >                               Driver sends SYNCH_CACHE command to the
> > FW
> >                               FW does not send SYNCH_CACHE to drives
> >                               FW returns SUCCESS
> >                ELSE
> >                               Driver does not send SYNCH_CACHE command
> > to the FW.
> >                               Driver return SUCCESS for that command.
> >                ENDIF
> >     ENDIF
> > ENDIF
> >
> > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> Can you please split this into two, so we can backport the bug fix without
> any of
> the feature addition junk?

James  - I am sending new patch making two logical fix as you requested.
JBOD fix will be marked for CC:stable and for Virtual disk I will post only
for head (not for stable). Let me know if resending complete series is good
or resending this patch is better.

>
> > Signed-off-by: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h        |  3 +++
> >  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c   | 10 ++--------
> >  drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c |  5 +++++
> >  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > index ca86c88..43fd14f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h
> > @@ -1429,6 +1429,8 @@ enum FW_BOOT_CONTEXT {
> >  #define MR_MAX_REPLY_QUEUES_EXT_OFFSET_SHIFT    14
> >  #define MR_MAX_MSIX_REG_ARRAY                   16
> >  #define MR_RDPQ_MODE_OFFSET			0X00800000
> > +#define MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET		0X01000000
> > +
> >  /*
> >  * register set for both 1068 and 1078 controllers
> >  * structure extended for 1078 registers @@ -2140,6 +2142,7 @@ struct
> > megasas_instance {
> >  	u8 is_imr;
> >  	u8 is_rdpq;
> >  	bool dev_handle;
> > +	bool fw_sync_cache_support;
> >  };
> >  struct MR_LD_VF_MAP {
> >  	u32 size;
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > index 3236632..f7a2ab1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c
> > @@ -1700,16 +1700,10 @@ inline int megasas_cmd_type(struct scsi_cmnd
> > *cmd)
> >  		goto out_done;
> >  	}
> >
> > -	switch (scmd->cmnd[0]) {
> > -	case SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE:
> > -		/*
> > -		 * FW takes care of flush cache on its own
> > -		 * No need to send it down
> > -		 */
> > +	if (MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd) && (scmd->cmnd[0] ==
> > SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) &&
> > +		(!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)) {
> >  		scmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
> >  		goto out_done;
>
> This, minus the  "&& (!instance->fw_sync_cache_support)" is all we need
> for the
> bug fix, correct?
Yes.   I will be sending patch for the same. It need only below check for
JBOD fix.
       if ((scmd->cmnd[0] == SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE) && MEGASAS_IS_LOGICAL(scmd))
{

>
> James
>
> > -	default:
> > -		break;
> >  	}
> >
> >  	return instance->instancet->build_and_issue_cmd(instance,
> > scmd);
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > index 2159f6a..2e61306 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
> > @@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static int megasas_create_sg_sense_fusion(struct
> > megasas_instance *instance)
> >  		goto fail_fw_init;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	instance->fw_sync_cache_support = (scratch_pad_2 &
> > +		MR_CAN_HANDLE_SYNC_CACHE_OFFSET) ? 1 : 0;
> > +	dev_info(&instance->pdev->dev, "FW supports sync cache\t:
> > %s\n",
> > +		 instance->fw_sync_cache_support ? "Yes" : "No");
> > +
> >  	IOCInitMessage =
> >  	  dma_alloc_coherent(&instance->pdev->dev,
> >  			     sizeof(struct MPI2_IOC_INIT_REQUEST),

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/7] megaraid_sas: Updates for scsi-next
@ 2016-10-20  9:04 Sumit Saxena
  2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware Sumit Saxena
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sumit Saxena @ 2016-10-20  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-scsi; +Cc: martin.petersen, thenzl, jejb, kashyap.desai, Sumit Saxena

Changes in v2:
1.  Removed unconditional msleep and moved calls to atomic_read into 
    megasas_wait_for_adapter_operational
2.  Updated change log for patch #4.  Provided more detail in change log.
3.  Agreed to remove module parameter. If we remove module parameter,
    we can ask customer to disable WCE on drive to get similar impact.
4.  Always Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE for JBOD (non Raid) Device to Firmware.
5. Add log message printing the state of FW sync cache support
6. Moved version update patch to end of series

Sumit Saxena (7):
  megaraid_sas: For SRIOV enabled firmware, ensure VF driver waits for
    30secs before reset
  megaraid_sas: Send correct PhysArm to FW for R1 VD downgrade
  megaraid_sas: Do not fire DCMDs during PCI shutdown/detach
  megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware
  MAINTAINERS: Update megaraid maintainers list
  megaraid_sas: Do not set MPI2_TYPE_CUDA for JBOD FP path for FW which
    does not support JBOD sequence map
  megaraid_sas: driver version upgrade

 MAINTAINERS                                 | 10 +++---
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.h        |  7 +++--
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_base.c   | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fp.c     |  6 ++--
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 23 +++++++++-----
 5 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-10-21 16:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-10-21 12:08 [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware Kashyap Desai
2016-10-21 12:36 ` James Bottomley
2016-10-21 13:39   ` Kashyap Desai
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-20  9:04 [PATCH v2 0/7] megaraid_sas: Updates for scsi-next Sumit Saxena
2016-10-20  9:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] megaraid_sas: Send SYNCHRONIZE_CACHE command to firmware Sumit Saxena
2016-10-21 10:01   ` Ric Wheeler
2016-10-21 11:01   ` James Bottomley
2016-10-21 16:01     ` Tomas Henzl

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.