All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
@ 2012-07-18  0:16 Bodke, Kishore K
  2012-07-18  0:20 ` Bruce Ashfield
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2012-07-18  0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: yocto@yoctoproject.org

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 621 bytes --]

Hi,

I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.

WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were installed but not shipped in any package:
WARNING:   /etc
ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on /work/<....>/linux-yocto-3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb255888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa

Any idea why I get this?

Thanks
Kishore.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3775 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
  2012-07-18  0:16 ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2012-07-18  0:20 ` Bruce Ashfield
  2012-07-18  0:25   ` Bodke, Kishore K
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org

On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>
> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
> installed but not shipped in any package:
>
> WARNING: /etc
>
> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
> /work/<….>/linux-yocto-3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb255888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>
> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>
> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>
> Any idea why I get this?

It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
Have you tweaked the configuration ?

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> Thanks
>
> Kishore.
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
  2012-07-18  0:20 ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2012-07-18  0:25   ` Bodke, Kishore K
  2012-07-18  0:29     ` Bruce Ashfield
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2012-07-18  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
>To: Bodke, Kishore K
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
>yocto_3.2.bb
>
>On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
>> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>>
>> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
>> installed but not shipped in any package:
>>
>> WARNING: /etc
>>
>> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
>> /work/<....>/linux-yocto-
>3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb2
>55888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-
>vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>>
>> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>>
>> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>>
>> Any idea why I get this?
>
>It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
>Have you tweaked the configuration ?

I have not edited any configuration.  I am using all 64 bit only.

>
>Cheers,
>
>Bruce
>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Kishore.
>>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
  2012-07-18  0:25   ` Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2012-07-18  0:29     ` Bruce Ashfield
  2012-07-18  0:32       ` Bodke, Kishore K
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18  0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart

On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>
>> On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
>>> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>>>
>>> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
>>> installed but not shipped in any package:
>>>
>>> WARNING: /etc
>>>
>>> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
>>> /work/<....>/linux-yocto-
>> 3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb2
>> 55888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-
>> vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>>>
>>> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>>>
>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>>>
>>> Any idea why I get this?
>>
>> It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
>> Have you tweaked the configuration ?
>
> I have not edited any configuration.  I am using all 64 bit only.

Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
handy to check.

I can start a build overnight to try and see what is happening, if you
send the details about what you are building here.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Kishore.
>>>
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
  2012-07-18  0:29     ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2012-07-18  0:32       ` Bodke, Kishore K
  2012-07-18  0:34         ` Bruce Ashfield
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2012-07-18  0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
>To: Bodke, Kishore K
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
>Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
>yocto_3.2.bb
>
>On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for
>linux-
>>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>>
>>> On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
>>>> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
>>>> installed but not shipped in any package:
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: /etc
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
>>>> /work/<....>/linux-yocto-
>>>
>3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb2
>>> 55888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-
>>> vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>>>>
>>>> Any idea why I get this?
>>>
>>> It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
>>> Have you tweaked the configuration ?
>>
>> I have not edited any configuration.  I am using all 64 bit only.
>
>Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
>listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
>handy to check.

I am building a new BSP which is not listed here.  That is the reason I am using local clone.
I cloned 3.2 kernel and created a new BSP based on ROMLEY.

Thanks
Kishore.

>
>I can start a build overnight to try and see what is happening, if you
>send the details about what you are building here.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bruce
>
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Kishore.
>>>>
>>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
  2012-07-18  0:32       ` Bodke, Kishore K
@ 2012-07-18  0:34         ` Bruce Ashfield
  2012-07-18 21:45           ` Bodke, Kishore K
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2012-07-18  0:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bodke, Kishore K; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart

On 12-07-17 8:32 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>
>> On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
>>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for
>> linux-
>>>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>>>
>>>> On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
>>>>> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
>>>>> installed but not shipped in any package:
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: /etc
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
>>>>> /work/<....>/linux-yocto-
>>>>
>> 3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb2
>>>> 55888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-
>>>> vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>>>>>
>>>>> Any idea why I get this?
>>>>
>>>> It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
>>>> Have you tweaked the configuration ?
>>>
>>> I have not edited any configuration.  I am using all 64 bit only.
>>
>> Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
>> listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
>> handy to check.
>
> I am building a new BSP which is not listed here.  That is the reason I am using local clone.
> I cloned 3.2 kernel and created a new BSP based on ROMLEY.

Without seeing your configuration, I can't say more. It looks like the
tuning for userspace is 64 and you've built a 32 bit kernel, or vice
versa.

Darren/Tom may be able to help more.

Cheers,

Bruce

>
> Thanks
> Kishore.
>
>>
>> I can start a build overnight to try and see what is happening, if you
>> send the details about what you are building here.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>>
>>>
>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb
  2012-07-18  0:34         ` Bruce Ashfield
@ 2012-07-18 21:45           ` Bodke, Kishore K
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bodke, Kishore K @ 2012-07-18 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, Darren Hart



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:35 PM
>To: Bodke, Kishore K
>Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
>Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-
>yocto_3.2.bb
>
>On 12-07-17 8:32 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:30 PM
>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; Zanussi, Tom; Darren Hart
>>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for
>linux-
>>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>>
>>> On 12-07-17 8:25 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfield@windriver.com]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 5:21 PM
>>>>> To: Bodke, Kishore K
>>>>> Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for
>>> linux-
>>>>> yocto_3.2.bb
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12-07-17 8:16 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am using local clone for 3.2 kernel and I get build fail for
>>>>>> Linux-yocto_3.2.bb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: For recipe linux-yocto, the following files/directories were
>>>>>> installed but not shipped in any package:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: /etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) on
>>>>>> /work/<....>/linux-yocto-
>>>>>
>>>
>3.2.18+git1+20958298c233d15b1d705e7b0eb93282d6ecb5de_1+7d26ac083cb2
>>>>> 55888536b42b622b97fb438753ad-r1/packages-split/kernel-
>>>>> vmlinux/boot/vmlinux-3.2.18-yocto-standard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: QA run found fatal errors. Please consider fixing them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_package_qa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any idea why I get this?
>>>>>
>>>>> It means you've managed to get a 32 bit object in a 64 bit build.
>>>>> Have you tweaked the configuration ?
>>>>
>>>> I have not edited any configuration.  I am using all 64 bit only.
>>>
>>> Can anyone else confirm this ? What BSP is this ? either it isn't
>>> listed above .. or I missed it. Tom ? Darren ? I don't have a build
>>> handy to check.
>>
>> I am building a new BSP which is not listed here.  That is the reason I am
>using local clone.
>> I cloned 3.2 kernel and created a new BSP based on ROMLEY.
>
>Without seeing your configuration, I can't say more. It looks like the
>tuning for userspace is 64 and you've built a 32 bit kernel, or vice
>versa.

I tried rebuilding from scratch. It built fine.
Not sure why it failed for the first time, Though it was the same configurations settings I had.

Thanks
Kishore.

>
>Darren/Tom may be able to help more.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Bruce
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishore.
>>
>>>
>>> I can start a build overnight to try and see what is happening, if you
>>> send the details about what you are building here.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruce
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kishore.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-07-18 21:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-18  0:16 ERROR: QA Issue: Architecture did not match (62 to 3) for linux-yocto_3.2.bb Bodke, Kishore K
2012-07-18  0:20 ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-07-18  0:25   ` Bodke, Kishore K
2012-07-18  0:29     ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-07-18  0:32       ` Bodke, Kishore K
2012-07-18  0:34         ` Bruce Ashfield
2012-07-18 21:45           ` Bodke, Kishore K

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.