From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: qemu-kvm-1.0.1 - unable to exit if vcpu is in infinite loop
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:21:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50333717.6050207@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5030B51E.3010704@redhat.com>
On 2012-08-19 11:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 06:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>>> Can anyone imagine that such a barrier may actually be required? If it
>>>> is currently possible that env->stop is evaluated before we called into
>>>> sigtimedwait in qemu_kvm_eat_signals, then we could actually eat the
>>>> signal without properly processing its reason (stop).
>>
>> Should not be required (TM): Both signal eating / stop checking and stop
>> setting / signal generation happens under the BQL, thus the ordering
>> must not make a difference here.
>
> Agree.
>
>
>> Don't see where we could lose a signal. Maybe due to a subtle memory
>> corruption that sets thread_kicked to non-zero, preventing the kicking
>> this way.
>
> Cannot be ruled out, yet too much of a coincidence.
>
> Could be a kernel bug (either in kvm or elsewhere), we've had several
> before in this area.
>
> Is this reproducible?
Not for me. Peter only hit it very rarely, Peter obviously more easily.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm-1.0.1 - unable to exit if vcpu is in infinite loop
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:21:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50333717.6050207@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5030B51E.3010704@redhat.com>
On 2012-08-19 11:42, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 06:04 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>>> Can anyone imagine that such a barrier may actually be required? If it
>>>> is currently possible that env->stop is evaluated before we called into
>>>> sigtimedwait in qemu_kvm_eat_signals, then we could actually eat the
>>>> signal without properly processing its reason (stop).
>>
>> Should not be required (TM): Both signal eating / stop checking and stop
>> setting / signal generation happens under the BQL, thus the ordering
>> must not make a difference here.
>
> Agree.
>
>
>> Don't see where we could lose a signal. Maybe due to a subtle memory
>> corruption that sets thread_kicked to non-zero, preventing the kicking
>> this way.
>
> Cannot be ruled out, yet too much of a coincidence.
>
> Could be a kernel bug (either in kvm or elsewhere), we've had several
> before in this area.
>
> Is this reproducible?
Not for me. Peter only hit it very rarely, Peter obviously more easily.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SDP-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-21 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-28 13:05 qemu-kvm-1.0.1 - unable to exit if vcpu is in infinite loop Peter Lieven
2012-06-28 13:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-28 15:02 ` Peter Lieven
2012-06-28 15:22 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-06-28 16:29 ` Peter Lieven
2012-06-28 16:32 ` Avi Kivity
2012-06-28 19:27 ` Peter Lieven
2012-07-01 8:19 ` Avi Kivity
2012-07-01 8:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2012-07-01 19:18 ` Peter Lieven
2012-07-01 19:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Lieven
2012-07-02 7:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-07-02 7:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-07-02 8:12 ` Peter Lieven
2012-07-02 8:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Lieven
2012-08-06 15:11 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-06 15:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-17 13:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 13:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 14:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 14:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 14:41 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 14:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 15:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-17 15:04 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2012-08-19 9:42 ` Avi Kivity
2012-08-19 9:42 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2012-08-21 7:21 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2012-08-21 7:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2012-08-21 8:23 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-21 8:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2012-08-22 12:52 ` Peter Lieven
2012-08-22 12:52 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50333717.6050207@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@dlhnet.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.