Re: -next queue and EDID stuff

[Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>]

On 8/23/12 7:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi guys (but mainly ajax)
>
> I have a bunch of EDID and quirk stuff outstanding,
>
> I've made a bundle on patchwork for it
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/bundle/airlied/edid-review/

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1364501/ - I'm nervous about this on 
non-EDDC monitors, things are touchy enough as it is.  Would prefer if 
we did the normal 2-message thing for blocks 0 and 1, and only did 3 
messages if segment != 0.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1310091/ - nak, the commit message 
itself gives away that we're doing else something wrong here.  If 
DISABLE_AUDIO is sufficient for one driver it should be sufficient for all.

For the rest (though I have some complaints that aren't enough to 
justify saying no):

Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>

Paul's FORCE_REDUCED_BLANKING series makes me nervous about what those 
monitors will do over VGA, since from a conversation we had on IRC he 
hasn't been able to test that.

I don't really see the point in the EDID_MFG_ID() bit of the quirks 
rework.  Have we actually seen a monitor where that field was malformed 
in a way that would require it?

- ajax