From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, vrajesh@umich.edu, daniel.santos@pobox.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rbtree based interval tree as a prio_tree replacement
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:43:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503FDE96.3040702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120830143401.be06d61b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 08/30/2012 05:34 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It would good to have solid acknowledgement from Rik that this approach
> does indeed suit his pending vma changes.
It does. Michel's rbtree rework is exactly what I need.
I do not need the interval tree bits, but the faster
augmented rbtree is required for my vma changes to
no longer have the performance regression Johannes
measured with a kernel build.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, vrajesh@umich.edu, daniel.santos@pobox.com,
aarcange@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] rbtree based interval tree as a prio_tree replacement
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:43:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503FDE96.3040702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120830143401.be06d61b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On 08/30/2012 05:34 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It would good to have solid acknowledgement from Rik that this approach
> does indeed suit his pending vma changes.
It does. Michel's rbtree rework is exactly what I need.
I do not need the interval tree bits, but the faster
augmented rbtree is required for my vma changes to
no longer have the performance regression Johannes
measured with a kernel build.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-30 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 7:25 [PATCH 0/5] rbtree based interval tree as a prio_tree replacement Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] rbtree: add prio tree and interval tree tests Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: replace vma prio_tree with an interval tree Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-14 12:11 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-14 12:11 ` Hillf Danton
2012-08-07 7:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] kmemleak: use rbtree instead of prio tree Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-08 17:07 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-08 17:07 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-09 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-08-09 8:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-08-15 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-08-15 16:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-08-15 20:53 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-15 20:53 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-16 15:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-08-16 15:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-08-07 7:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] prio_tree: remove Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] rbtree: move augmented rbtree functionality to rbtree_augmented.h Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-07 7:25 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-08 1:19 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-08 1:19 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-13 8:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] rbtree based interval tree as a prio_tree replacement Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-13 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-08-13 10:37 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-13 10:37 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-30 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-30 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2012-08-30 21:43 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2012-08-30 21:43 ` Rik van Riel
2012-08-30 22:33 ` Michel Lespinasse
2012-08-30 22:33 ` Michel Lespinasse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503FDE96.3040702@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.santos@pobox.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vrajesh@umich.edu \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.