All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 14:51:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504A09FD.1050201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347028510.2484.736.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On 09/07/2012 10:35 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 17:57 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> When a xfrm policy is inserted or deleted, we must invalidate
>> all dst and recalculate the route.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
>> ---
>>   include/net/dst.h     | 7 +++++++
>>   net/core/dst.c        | 1 +
>>   net/core/sock.c       | 4 ++--
>>   net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 3 +--
>>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
>> index 9a78810..478e55a 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dst.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct dst_entry {
>>   	atomic_t		__refcnt;	/* client references	*/
>>   	int			__use;
>>   	unsigned long		lastuse;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> +	u32			flow_cache_genid;
>> +#endif
>>   	union {
>>   		struct dst_entry	*next;
>>   		struct rtable __rcu	*rt_next;
>> @@ -457,6 +460,10 @@ static inline int dst_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>>   static inline struct dst_entry *dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
>>   {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> +	if (dst->flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +#endif
>
> Hmm... cant we reuse rt_genid ?
>
> (When changing flow_cache_genid, change &net->ipv4.rt_genid)
>

I thought of that too, but that requires hacking xfrm to know the 
namespace at the time it changes the flow_cache_genid.  This one seems 
simpler to do.

-vlad


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check()
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 10:51:41 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504A09FD.1050201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347028510.2484.736.camel@edumazet-glaptop>

On 09/07/2012 10:35 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 17:57 +0200, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>> When a xfrm policy is inserted or deleted, we must invalidate
>> all dst and recalculate the route.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
>> ---
>>   include/net/dst.h     | 7 +++++++
>>   net/core/dst.c        | 1 +
>>   net/core/sock.c       | 4 ++--
>>   net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 3 +--
>>   4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
>> index 9a78810..478e55a 100644
>> --- a/include/net/dst.h
>> +++ b/include/net/dst.h
>> @@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct dst_entry {
>>   	atomic_t		__refcnt;	/* client references	*/
>>   	int			__use;
>>   	unsigned long		lastuse;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> +	u32			flow_cache_genid;
>> +#endif
>>   	union {
>>   		struct dst_entry	*next;
>>   		struct rtable __rcu	*rt_next;
>> @@ -457,6 +460,10 @@ static inline int dst_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>>   static inline struct dst_entry *dst_check(struct dst_entry *dst, u32 cookie)
>>   {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
>> +	if (dst->flow_cache_genid != atomic_read(&flow_cache_genid))
>> +		return NULL;
>> +#endif
>
> Hmm... cant we reuse rt_genid ?
>
> (When changing flow_cache_genid, change &net->ipv4.rt_genid)
>

I thought of that too, but that requires hacking xfrm to know the 
namespace at the time it changes the flow_cache_genid.  This one seems 
simpler to do.

-vlad

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-07 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-06 15:47 [PATCH] sctp: check dst validity after IPsec operations Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:40 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:04 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:04   ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 16:40   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 16:40     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 17:03     ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-06 17:03       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 12:24       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:24         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 12:07     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-06 18:10 ` David Miller
2012-09-06 18:10   ` David Miller
2012-09-07 13:47   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 13:47     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 13:55     ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 13:56       ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:20         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:20           ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 14:35         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:35           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 14:47           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 14:47             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:09             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:09               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:13               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:13                 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:21                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:21                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 18:48                   ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48                     ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48                 ` David Miller
2012-09-07 18:48                   ` David Miller
2012-09-10 12:47                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 12:47                     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:10                     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:10                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-10 13:22                   ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:21                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:21                         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:56                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:56                           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                           ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/4] netns: move net->ipv4.rt_genid to net->rt_genid Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/4] xfrm: invalidate dst on policy insertion/deletion Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-11  8:09                               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-12  7:40                               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-12  7:40                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-17 16:49                             ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries David Miller
2012-09-17 16:49                               ` David Miller
2012-09-17 18:14                               ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:14                                 ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-17 18:25                                 ` David Miller
2012-09-17 18:25                                   ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:52                                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:52                                     ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-17 19:54                                     ` David Miller
2012-09-17 19:54                                       ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08                                       ` David Miller
2012-09-18 20:08                                         ` David Miller
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] ipv6: use net->rt_genid to check dst validity Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:29                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:29                         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:34                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:34                           ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:43                           ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:43                             ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:44                             ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:44                               ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                     ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] ipv6: use DST_* macro to set obselete field Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 13:22                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:35                     ` [PATCH net-next v2] Take care of xfrm policy when checking dst entries Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:35                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 14:38                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 14:38                         ` Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-10 17:18                       ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:18                         ` David Miller
2012-09-10 17:59                         ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 17:59                           ` Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-10 18:01                           ` David Miller
2012-09-10 18:01                             ` David Miller
2012-09-22 16:49                             ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-22 16:49                               ` Jan Engelhardt
2012-09-07 14:51           ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2012-09-07 14:51             ` [PATCH 1/2] dst: take into account policy update on check() Vlad Yasevich
2012-09-07 15:08             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 15:08               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-09-07 13:56       ` [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: remove rt6i_flow_cache_genid field in rt6_info Nicolas Dichtel
2012-09-07 15:57         ` Nicolas Dichtel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504A09FD.1050201@gmail.com \
    --to=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.