All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:08:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50603829.9050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924102324.GA22303@aftab.osrc.amd.com>

On 09/24/2012 03:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we're able to trigger the oops below when doing CPU hotplug tests.
> 

I hit this problem as well, which I reported here, a few days ago:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/222

<snip>

> 	...
> 
> and from looking at the register dump below, the dividend, which should
> be in %rdx:%rax is 0 and the divisor (denominator) we've got from
> bdi_writeout_fraction and is in %rdi is also 0. Which is strange because
> fprop_fraction_percpu guards for division by zero by setting denominator
> to 1 if it were zero but what about the case where den > num? Can that
> even happen?
> 
> And also, what happens if num is 0? Which it kinda is by looking at %rcx
> where there's copy of it.
>

Going by the usage of percpu_counter_read_positive() (which is used to get
both the values of num and den), the least value that num or den can have
is zero. So, the C code to guard against divide-by-zero looks OK to me.
Which unfortunately keeps the mystery unsolved :(

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
	Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@amd.com>
Subject: Re: divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:08:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50603829.9050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120924102324.GA22303@aftab.osrc.amd.com>

On 09/24/2012 03:53 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we're able to trigger the oops below when doing CPU hotplug tests.
> 

I hit this problem as well, which I reported here, a few days ago:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/222

<snip>

> 	...
> 
> and from looking at the register dump below, the dividend, which should
> be in %rdx:%rax is 0 and the divisor (denominator) we've got from
> bdi_writeout_fraction and is in %rdi is also 0. Which is strange because
> fprop_fraction_percpu guards for division by zero by setting denominator
> to 1 if it were zero but what about the case where den > num? Can that
> even happen?
> 
> And also, what happens if num is 0? Which it kinda is by looking at %rcx
> where there's copy of it.
>

Going by the usage of percpu_counter_read_positive() (which is used to get
both the values of num and den), the least value that num or den can have
is zero. So, the C code to guard against divide-by-zero looks OK to me.
Which unfortunately keeps the mystery unsolved :(

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-24 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-24 10:23 divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 10:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-09-24 10:38   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:05   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 11:05     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 11:13     ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:13       ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:34       ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 11:34         ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 11:51         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:51           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 12:20         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:20           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:29           ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 12:29             ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 12:56             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:56               ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:54               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 18:54                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 14:23 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 14:23   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 14:36   ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 14:36     ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:16     ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 18:16       ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 18:19       ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:19         ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:48         ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 18:48           ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 19:31           ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 19:31             ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 20:07             ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:07               ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:17               ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:17                 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 21:21                 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 21:21                   ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 22:27                   ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 22:27                     ` Jan Kara
2012-09-25  8:57                 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-25  8:57                   ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 20:48           ` [PATCH] CPU hotplug, writeback: Don't call writeback_set_ratelimit() too often during hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 20:48             ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-28 12:27             ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-28 12:27               ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-28 14:46               ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-28 14:46                 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-10-03 23:11               ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-03 23:11                 ` Ni zhan Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50603829.9050904@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@amd64.org \
    --cc=conny.seidel@amd.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.