From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@amd.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] CPU hotplug, writeback: Don't call writeback_set_ratelimit() too often during hotplug
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:18:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5060C714.8030606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5060AB0E.3070809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The CPU hotplug callback related to writeback calls writeback_set_ratelimit()
during every state change in the hotplug sequence. This is unnecessary
since num_online_cpus() changes only once during the entire hotplug operation.
So invoke the function only once per hotplug, thereby avoiding the
unnecessary repetition of those costly calculations.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 5ad5ce2..830893b 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1602,10 +1602,18 @@ void writeback_set_ratelimit(void)
}
static int __cpuinit
-ratelimit_handler(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long u, void *v)
+ratelimit_handler(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action,
+ void *hcpu)
{
- writeback_set_ratelimit();
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+ case CPU_ONLINE:
+ case CPU_DEAD:
+ writeback_set_ratelimit();
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+ default:
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+ }
}
static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata ratelimit_nb = {
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Conny Seidel <conny.seidel@amd.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] CPU hotplug, writeback: Don't call writeback_set_ratelimit() too often during hotplug
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 02:18:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5060C714.8030606@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5060AB0E.3070809@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The CPU hotplug callback related to writeback calls writeback_set_ratelimit()
during every state change in the hotplug sequence. This is unnecessary
since num_online_cpus() changes only once during the entire hotplug operation.
So invoke the function only once per hotplug, thereby avoiding the
unnecessary repetition of those costly calculations.
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 14 +++++++++++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 5ad5ce2..830893b 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1602,10 +1602,18 @@ void writeback_set_ratelimit(void)
}
static int __cpuinit
-ratelimit_handler(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long u, void *v)
+ratelimit_handler(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action,
+ void *hcpu)
{
- writeback_set_ratelimit();
- return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
+ case CPU_ONLINE:
+ case CPU_DEAD:
+ writeback_set_ratelimit();
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+ default:
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+ }
}
static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata ratelimit_nb = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-24 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-24 10:23 divide error: bdi_dirty_limit+0x5a/0x9e Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 10:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 10:38 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 11:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 11:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:34 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 11:34 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 11:51 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 11:51 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:29 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 12:29 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-24 12:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 12:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 18:54 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 14:23 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 14:23 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 14:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:16 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 18:16 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 18:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 18:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 18:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-24 19:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 19:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-09-24 20:07 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:07 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:17 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 20:17 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 21:21 ` Andrew Morton
2012-09-24 22:27 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-24 22:27 ` Jan Kara
2012-09-25 8:57 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-25 8:57 ` Conny Seidel
2012-09-24 20:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat [this message]
2012-09-24 20:48 ` [PATCH] CPU hotplug, writeback: Don't call writeback_set_ratelimit() too often during hotplug Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-28 12:27 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-28 12:27 ` Fengguang Wu
2012-09-28 14:46 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-09-28 14:46 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-10-03 23:11 ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-03 23:11 ` Ni zhan Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5060C714.8030606@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=conny.seidel@amd.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.