From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:12:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506E8157.5030801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005011237.GA17182@verge.net.au>
On Friday 05 October 2012 06:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:41:46PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 October 2012 02:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> The TWD and SCU configs are selected by default as long as
>>> SCORPIONMP is false and/or MCT is false. Implementing the logic
>>> this way certainly saves lines in the Kconfig but it precludes
>>> those machines which select SCORPIONMP or MCT from participating
>>> in the single zImage effort because when those machines are
>>> combined with other SMP capable machines the TWD and SCU are no
>>> longer selected.
>>>
>>> Push the select out to the machine entries so that we can compile
>>> these machines together and still select the appropriate configs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd<sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: David Brown<davidb@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Pawel Moll<pawel.moll@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring<rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>> Cc: Russell King<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Sascha Hauer<kernel@pengutronix.de>
>>> Cc: Shiraz Hashim<shiraz.hashim@st.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Horman<horms@verge.net.au>
>>> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar<srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
>>> Cc: Stephen Warren<swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar<viresh.linux@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Does OMAP5 need to select TWD? I suspect not if it uses the
>>> architected timers.
>>>
>> Nope. OMAP5 don't use TWD. Infact the external SCU is also used
>> for A9 SOCs. You might want to check other A15 SOCS for SCU as
>> well.
>
> In that case I am a bit confused by the following result:
>
> # git checkout v3.6
> # ARCH=arm make omap2plus_defconfig
> # grep '(SOC_OMAP5|_SCU|_TWD|CONFIG_SMP|CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS)=' .config
> CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5=y
> CONFIG_SMP=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SCU=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_TWD=y
> CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS=y
Thats because omap2plus_defconfig build all the OMAP machines together
including OMAP4 and OMAP5.
Regards
Santosh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.hashim@st.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@gmail.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:12:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506E8157.5030801@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005011237.GA17182@verge.net.au>
On Friday 05 October 2012 06:42 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:41:46PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Thursday 04 October 2012 02:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> The TWD and SCU configs are selected by default as long as
>>> SCORPIONMP is false and/or MCT is false. Implementing the logic
>>> this way certainly saves lines in the Kconfig but it precludes
>>> those machines which select SCORPIONMP or MCT from participating
>>> in the single zImage effort because when those machines are
>>> combined with other SMP capable machines the TWD and SCU are no
>>> longer selected.
>>>
>>> Push the select out to the machine entries so that we can compile
>>> these machines together and still select the appropriate configs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd<sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: David Brown<davidb@codeaurora.org>
>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Pawel Moll<pawel.moll@arm.com>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring<rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>> Cc: Russell King<linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Sascha Hauer<kernel@pengutronix.de>
>>> Cc: Shiraz Hashim<shiraz.hashim@st.com>
>>> Cc: Simon Horman<horms@verge.net.au>
>>> Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar<srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
>>> Cc: Stephen Warren<swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar<viresh.linux@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Does OMAP5 need to select TWD? I suspect not if it uses the
>>> architected timers.
>>>
>> Nope. OMAP5 don't use TWD. Infact the external SCU is also used
>> for A9 SOCs. You might want to check other A15 SOCS for SCU as
>> well.
>
> In that case I am a bit confused by the following result:
>
> # git checkout v3.6
> # ARCH=arm make omap2plus_defconfig
> # grep '(SOC_OMAP5|_SCU|_TWD|CONFIG_SMP|CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS)=' .config
> CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5=y
> CONFIG_SMP=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_SCU=y
> CONFIG_HAVE_ARM_TWD=y
> CONFIG_LOCAL_TIMERS=y
Thats because omap2plus_defconfig build all the OMAP machines together
including OMAP4 and OMAP5.
Regards
Santosh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-04 8:50 [PATCH] ARM: Push selects for TWD/SCU into machine entries Stephen Boyd
2012-10-04 8:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-10-04 8:52 ` viresh kumar
2012-10-04 8:52 ` viresh kumar
2012-10-04 9:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-04 9:11 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-04 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-10-04 19:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-10-05 1:12 ` Simon Horman
2012-10-05 1:12 ` Simon Horman
2012-10-05 6:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar [this message]
2012-10-05 6:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-10-04 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-04 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-04 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-10-04 19:22 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-10-08 12:56 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-08 12:56 ` Rob Herring
2012-10-05 1:13 ` Simon Horman
2012-10-05 1:13 ` Simon Horman
2012-10-08 12:15 ` Pawel Moll
2012-10-08 12:15 ` Pawel Moll
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506E8157.5030801@ti.com \
--to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.