From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074B8B5.3010307@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009164514.b7a7e227.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Stephen,
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
>> like this:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function 'pseries_remove_memblock':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:103:17: error: unused variable 'pfn' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>>
>> Caused by commit d760afd4d257 ("memory-hotplug: suppress "Trying to free
>> nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning").
>>
>> I can't see what the point of the "pfn" variable is
>
> This:
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~a
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
> sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> - ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
I believe the error to be fixed with this patch.
Could you try it?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>> and this patch never
>> appeared in linux-next before being merged. :-(
>
> It was first sighted October 3.
>
>> I have reverted that commit for today.
>>
>> If this patch truly was authored yesterday (according the Author Date in
>> git), why was it merged yesterday while still under discussion? And the
>> latest update to it still has this build problem ... did anyone even try
>> to build this for powerpc (since that architecture was obviously
>> affected)?
>
> Apparently not - the ppc bit was a best-effort fixup for a patch which
> addresses an x86 problem.
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074B8B5.3010307@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009164514.b7a7e227.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Stephen,
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
>> like this:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function 'pseries_remove_memblock':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:103:17: error: unused variable 'pfn' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>>
>> Caused by commit d760afd4d257 ("memory-hotplug: suppress "Trying to free
>> nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning").
>>
>> I can't see what the point of the "pfn" variable is
>
> This:
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~a
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
> sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> - ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
I believe the error to be fixed with this patch.
Could you try it?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>> and this patch never
>> appeared in linux-next before being merged. :-(
>
> It was first sighted October 3.
>
>> I have reverted that commit for today.
>>
>> If this patch truly was authored yesterday (according the Author Date in
>> git), why was it merged yesterday while still under discussion? And the
>> latest update to it still has this build problem ... did anyone even try
>> to build this for powerpc (since that architecture was obviously
>> affected)?
>
> Apparently not - the ppc bit was a best-effort fixup for a patch which
> addresses an x86 problem.
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 08:52:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5074B8B5.3010307@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121009164514.b7a7e227.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hi Stephen,
2012/10/10 8:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:21:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> In Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed
>> like this:
>>
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c: In function 'pseries_remove_memblock':
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c:103:17: error: unused variable 'pfn' [-Werror=unused-variable]
>>
>> Caused by commit d760afd4d257 ("memory-hotplug: suppress "Trying to free
>> nonexistent resource <XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY>" warning").
>>
>> I can't see what the point of the "pfn" variable is
>
> This:
>
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c~a
> +++ a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int pseries_remove_memblock(unsig
> sections_to_remove = (memblock_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) / PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> for (i = 0; i < sections_to_remove; i++) {
> unsigned long pfn = start_pfn + i * PAGES_PER_SECTION;
> - ret = __remove_pages(zone, start_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> + ret = __remove_pages(zone, pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
I believe the error to be fixed with this patch.
Could you try it?
Thanks,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
>
>> and this patch never
>> appeared in linux-next before being merged. :-(
>
> It was first sighted October 3.
>
>> I have reverted that commit for today.
>>
>> If this patch truly was authored yesterday (according the Author Date in
>> git), why was it merged yesterday while still under discussion? And the
>> latest update to it still has this build problem ... did anyone even try
>> to build this for powerpc (since that architecture was obviously
>> affected)?
>
> Apparently not - the ppc bit was a best-effort fixup for a patch which
> addresses an x86 problem.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-09 23:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-09 23:21 linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-09 23:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-09 23:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu [this message]
2012-10-09 23:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-09 23:52 ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-10 3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10 3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10 3:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10 0:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10 0:07 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-18 4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-18 8:03 ` Jürgen Groß
2024-09-30 3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-30 10:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-30 10:50 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-09-30 11:00 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-06-30 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-30 3:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-19 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 0:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 0:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 0:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 1:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 1:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 1:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 2:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 2:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 2:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 2:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 2:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 2:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14 2:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-14 2:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-14 12:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-14 12:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-14 2:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14 2:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 23:07 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 23:17 ` Marco Elver
2021-09-07 23:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-07-30 22:58 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-30 22:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-30 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-30 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29 23:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29 23:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30 2:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30 2:30 ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-30 3:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30 3:22 ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-30 6:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-30 9:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-30 10:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-30 15:00 ` Will Deacon
2020-07-30 17:49 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30 18:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30 18:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 22:37 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-05 0:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-06-05 9:48 ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-20 10:23 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-31 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-31 4:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-31 9:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-04 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-04 7:39 ` Paul Mundt
2012-01-18 23:31 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-19 8:21 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-19 8:23 ` Jens Axboe
2011-11-06 23:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-06 23:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-07 1:52 ` David Miller
2011-11-07 2:47 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-07 3:36 ` David Miller
2011-11-07 5:29 ` Kirsher, Jeffrey T
2011-11-07 16:46 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-11-07 17:46 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-11-07 17:46 ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-25 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5074B8B5.3010307@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.