Re: [Powertop] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Adding report generator facility

[Igor Zhbanov <i.zhbanov at samsung.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2327 bytes --]

Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (10/09/12 21:25), Igor Zhbanov wrote:
>>> - I think null formatter could be a basic class with default
>>> implementation (null) of virtual functions, rather than separate
>>> implementation of basic formatter interface (abstract class).
>> One more note.
>>
>> In my opinion making an empty implementation of the functions
>> inside the interface class is not good.
>>
>> The first reason, if now the programmer will forget to implement
>> some method of the abstract interface, the program will not compile,
>> instead of getting empty implementation and doing nothing.
> yes, this is valid point, but at the same time also one of the reasons we have commit
> review ;-)
>> Second, I don't like to mix all types of report formatters because some
>> of them would use string to hold the result, while another (probably XML)
>> could use tree for DOM implementation). And not every formatter need
>> escaping string function. So I have provides report_formatter_base
>> as a common part for CSV and HTML report formatters but not for
>> NULL formatter.
> in my example I don't think we mix anything. we just define a sub-set of common
> funictions and implementations via base_impl classes. while this looks like a win
> for current case (2 clases using string storage, so no code duplication), it may be
> not as cool if every formatter class would use different data storage type:
> xml, json, proto buff, whatever.
I think that if other formatters would have something common, then we will
create another base class for them, e.g. DOM-based storage. And it could be
that these formatters will not need to use string storage and related 
functions.

I have tried to make classes simple as possible without unneeded members.
So I use the abstract interface that every formatter must implement.
And so I have used one base class for CSV and HTML formatters that 
implements
common part of them (related to string storage).
But there could be more base classes containing common parts of another
formatters.

-- 
Best regards,
Igor Zhbanov,
Expert Software Engineer,
phone: +7 (495) 797 25 00 ext 3806
e-mail: i.zhbanov(a)samsung.com

ASWG, Moscow R&D center, Samsung Electronics
12 Dvintsev street, building 1
127018, Moscow, Russian Federation