All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] memory-hotplug: update mce_bad_pages when removing the memory
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:09:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507ECA43.3070402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350475735-26136-3-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi Wen,

> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!memmap)
> +		return;

I guess free_section_usemap() does the same thing.

> +	for (i = 0; i < PAGES_PER_SECTION; i++) {
> +		if (PageHWPoison(&memmap[i])) {
> +			atomic_long_sub(1, &mce_bad_pages);
> +			ClearPageHWPoison(&memmap[i]);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  {
>  	struct page *memmap = NULL;
> @@ -786,6 +803,10 @@ void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  		ms->pageblock_flags = NULL;
>  	}
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +	clear_hwpoisoned_pages(memmap, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +#endif
> +
>  	free_section_usemap(memmap, usemap);
>  }
>  #endif

But why put the call outside the  "if (ms->section_mem_map)" block?  If
you put it inside, then you don't have to check for !memmap in
clear_hwpoisoned_pages().

Also, we really frown on #ifdefs scattered throughout code.  I'd suggest
either:

+static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
... existing code
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE */
+}

or

+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
+static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
+{
... existing code
+}
+#else
+static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
+{}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE */

and keep the #ifdef out of sparse_remove_one_section().

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: wency@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rientjes@google.com, liuj97@gmail.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
	minchan.kim@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] memory-hotplug: update mce_bad_pages when removing the memory
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 08:09:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <507ECA43.3070402@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1350475735-26136-3-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hi Wen,

> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!memmap)
> +		return;

I guess free_section_usemap() does the same thing.

> +	for (i = 0; i < PAGES_PER_SECTION; i++) {
> +		if (PageHWPoison(&memmap[i])) {
> +			atomic_long_sub(1, &mce_bad_pages);
> +			ClearPageHWPoison(&memmap[i]);
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  {
>  	struct page *memmap = NULL;
> @@ -786,6 +803,10 @@ void sparse_remove_one_section(struct zone *zone, struct mem_section *ms)
>  		ms->pageblock_flags = NULL;
>  	}
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
> +	clear_hwpoisoned_pages(memmap, PAGES_PER_SECTION);
> +#endif
> +
>  	free_section_usemap(memmap, usemap);
>  }
>  #endif

But why put the call outside the  "if (ms->section_mem_map)" block?  If
you put it inside, then you don't have to check for !memmap in
clear_hwpoisoned_pages().

Also, we really frown on #ifdefs scattered throughout code.  I'd suggest
either:

+static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
... existing code
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE */
+}

or

+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
+static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
+{
... existing code
+}
+#else
+static void clear_hwpoisoned_pages(struct page *memmap, int nr_pages)
+{}
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE */

and keep the #ifdef out of sparse_remove_one_section().


  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-17 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-17 12:08 [PATCH v2 0/5] bugfix for memory hotplug wency
2012-10-17 12:08 ` wency
2012-10-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] memory-hotplug: skip HWPoisoned page when offlining pages wency
2012-10-17 12:08   ` wency
2012-10-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] memory-hotplug: update mce_bad_pages when removing the memory wency
2012-10-17 12:08   ` wency
2012-10-17 15:09   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2012-10-17 15:09     ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-18 22:20     ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-18 22:20       ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-19 13:42       ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-19 13:42         ` Dave Hansen
2012-10-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] memory-hotplug: auto offline page_cgroup when onlining memory block failed wency
2012-10-17 12:08   ` wency
2012-10-17 15:26   ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17 15:26     ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] memory-hotplug: fix NR_FREE_PAGES mismatch wency
2012-10-17 12:08   ` wency
2012-10-17 12:08 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] memory-hotplug: allocate zone's pcp before onlining pages wency
2012-10-17 12:08   ` wency
2012-10-17 12:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] bugfix for memory hotplug Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-17 12:22   ` Ni zhan Chen
2012-10-17 15:31   ` Wen Congyang
2012-10-17 15:31     ` Wen Congyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=507ECA43.3070402@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=liuj97@gmail.com \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=wency@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.