All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Andy King <acking@vmware.com>
Cc: pv-drivers@vmware.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	georgezhang@vmware.com
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:58:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509A06AB.2020700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <783561822.12637564.1352139592543.JavaMail.root@vmware.com>

On 11/05/12 19:19, Andy King wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
>> The big and only question is whether anyone can actually use any of
>> this stuff without your proprietary bits?
> 
> Do you mean the VMCI calls?  The VMCI driver is in the process of being
> upstreamed into the drivers/misc tree.  Greg (cc'd on these patches) is
> actively reviewing that code and we are addressing feedback.
> 
> Also, there was some interest from RedHat into using vSockets as a unified
> interface, routed over a hypervisor-specific transport (virtio or
> otherwise, although for now VMCI is the only one implemented).

Can you outline how this can be done?  From a quick look over the code
it seems like vsock has a hard dependency on vmci, is that correct?

When making vsock a generic, reusable kernel service it should be the
other way around:  vsock should provide the core implementation and an
interface where hypervisor-specific transports (vmci, virtio, xenbus,
...) can register themself.

cheers,
  Gerd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Andy King <acking@vmware.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	pv-drivers@vmware.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, georgezhang@vmware.com
Subject: Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:58:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <509A06AB.2020700@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <783561822.12637564.1352139592543.JavaMail.root@vmware.com>

On 11/05/12 19:19, Andy King wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
>> The big and only question is whether anyone can actually use any of
>> this stuff without your proprietary bits?
> 
> Do you mean the VMCI calls?  The VMCI driver is in the process of being
> upstreamed into the drivers/misc tree.  Greg (cc'd on these patches) is
> actively reviewing that code and we are addressing feedback.
> 
> Also, there was some interest from RedHat into using vSockets as a unified
> interface, routed over a hypervisor-specific transport (virtio or
> otherwise, although for now VMCI is the only one implemented).

Can you outline how this can be done?  From a quick look over the code
it seems like vsock has a hard dependency on vmci, is that correct?

When making vsock a generic, reusable kernel service it should be the
other way around:  vsock should provide the core implementation and an
interface where hypervisor-specific transports (vmci, virtio, xenbus,
...) can register themself.

cheers,
  Gerd

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-07  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-05 18:00 [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] VSOCK: vsock protocol implementation George Zhang
2012-11-06  9:10   ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-06  9:10     ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-06 14:31     ` [Pv-drivers] " Andy King
2012-11-05 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/6] VSOCK: vsock address implementaion George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/6] VSOCK: notification implementation George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:01 ` [PATCH 4/6] VSOCK: statistics implementation George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/6] VSOCK: utility functions George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:01 ` George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] VSOCK: header and config files George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:09 ` [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming David Miller
2012-11-05 18:09   ` David Miller
2012-11-05 18:10   ` David Miller
2012-11-05 18:10     ` David Miller
2012-11-05 18:24     ` George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:24       ` George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:19   ` [Pv-drivers] " Andy King
2012-11-07  6:58     ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2012-11-07  6:58       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2012-11-08 15:47       ` Andy King
2012-11-08 15:47         ` Andy King
2012-11-15 21:32       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-11-19  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-11-19  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-12-06 15:28         ` Andy King
2012-12-06 15:28           ` Andy King
2012-11-15 21:32       ` Anthony Liguori
2012-11-05 18:23 ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-05 18:23   ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-05 18:32   ` George Zhang
2012-11-05 18:32     ` George Zhang
2012-11-11 21:59     ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-11 21:59       ` Sasha Levin
2012-11-14 16:42       ` [Pv-drivers] " Andy King
2012-11-06  9:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-06  9:00   ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-06  9:06   ` Stephen Hemminger
2012-11-06  9:06     ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-01-08 23:59 George Zhang
2013-01-09  0:21 ` Greg KH
2013-01-09  1:30   ` David Miller
2013-01-09  1:41     ` [Pv-drivers] " Dmitry Torokhov
2013-01-09  1:41       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-01-09  1:46       ` David Miller
2013-01-09  1:46         ` David Miller
2013-01-09  2:22         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-01-09  2:22           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2013-01-09  8:10           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-01-09  8:10             ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-01-10  2:42             ` Andy King
2013-01-10  2:42               ` Andy King
2013-01-25 21:33               ` Andy King
2013-01-25 21:33               ` Andy King
2013-02-05  4:42         ` Andy King
2013-02-05  4:42           ` Andy King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=509A06AB.2020700@redhat.com \
    --to=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=acking@vmware.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=georgezhang@vmware.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.