From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memcg, oom: provide more precise dump info while memcg oom happening
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:07:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509B7658.1020807@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352277696-21724-1-git-send-email-handai.szj@taobao.com>
(2012/11/07 17:41), Sha Zhengju wrote:
> From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
>
> Current, when a memcg oom is happening the oom dump messages is still global
> state and provides few useful info for users. This patch prints more pointed
> memcg page statistics for memcg-oom.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++-
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 0eab7d5..2df5e72 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,14 @@ static const char * const mem_cgroup_events_names[] = {
> "pgmajfault",
> };
>
> +static const char * const mem_cgroup_lru_names[] = {
> + "inactive_anon",
> + "active_anon",
> + "inactive_file",
> + "active_file",
> + "unevictable",
> +};
> +
Is this for the same strings with show_free_areas() ?
> /*
> * Per memcg event counter is incremented at every pagein/pageout. With THP,
> * it will be incremated by the number of pages. This counter is used for
> @@ -1501,8 +1509,59 @@ static void move_unlock_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, *flags);
> }
>
> +#define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10))
> +static void mem_cgroup_print_oom_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *mi;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!memcg->use_hierarchy && memcg != root_mem_cgroup) {
Why do you need to have this condition check ?
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
> + if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
> + continue;
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%ldKB ", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
> + K(mem_cgroup_read_stat(memcg, i)));
Hm, how about using the same style with show_free_areas() ?
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_NSTATS; i++)
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%lu ", mem_cgroup_events_names[i],
> + mem_cgroup_read_events(memcg, i));
> +
I don't think EVENTS info is useful for oom.
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_LRU_LISTS; i++)
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%luKB ", mem_cgroup_lru_names[i],
> + K(mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(i))));
How far does your new information has different format than usual oom ?
Could you show a sample and difference in changelog ?
Of course, I prefer both of them has similar format.
> + } else {
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
> + long long val = 0;
> +
> + if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
> + continue;
> + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
> + val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(mi, i);
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%lldKB ", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i], K(val));
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_NSTATS; i++) {
> + unsigned long long val = 0;
> +
> + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
> + val += mem_cgroup_read_events(mi, i);
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%llu ",
> + mem_cgroup_events_names[i], val);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_LRU_LISTS; i++) {
> + unsigned long long val = 0;
> +
> + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
> + val += mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(mi, BIT(i));
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%lluKB ", mem_cgroup_lru_names[i], K(val));
> + }
> + }
> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
> +}
> /**
> - * mem_cgroup_print_oom_info: Called from OOM with tasklist_lock held in read mode.
> * @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
> * @p: Task that is going to be killed
> *
> @@ -1569,6 +1628,8 @@ done:
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE) >> 10,
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_LIMIT) >> 10,
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_FAILCNT));
> +
> + mem_cgroup_print_oom_stat(memcg);
> }
please put directly in print_oom_info()
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, mhocko@suse.cz,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, rientjes@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] memcg, oom: provide more precise dump info while memcg oom happening
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:07:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <509B7658.1020807@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1352277696-21724-1-git-send-email-handai.szj@taobao.com>
(2012/11/07 17:41), Sha Zhengju wrote:
> From: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
>
> Current, when a memcg oom is happening the oom dump messages is still global
> state and provides few useful info for users. This patch prints more pointed
> memcg page statistics for memcg-oom.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sha Zhengju <handai.szj@taobao.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++-
> 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 0eab7d5..2df5e72 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -118,6 +118,14 @@ static const char * const mem_cgroup_events_names[] = {
> "pgmajfault",
> };
>
> +static const char * const mem_cgroup_lru_names[] = {
> + "inactive_anon",
> + "active_anon",
> + "inactive_file",
> + "active_file",
> + "unevictable",
> +};
> +
Is this for the same strings with show_free_areas() ?
> /*
> * Per memcg event counter is incremented at every pagein/pageout. With THP,
> * it will be incremated by the number of pages. This counter is used for
> @@ -1501,8 +1509,59 @@ static void move_unlock_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&memcg->move_lock, *flags);
> }
>
> +#define K(x) ((x) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10))
> +static void mem_cgroup_print_oom_stat(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> +{
> + struct mem_cgroup *mi;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!memcg->use_hierarchy && memcg != root_mem_cgroup) {
Why do you need to have this condition check ?
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
> + if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
> + continue;
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%ldKB ", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i],
> + K(mem_cgroup_read_stat(memcg, i)));
Hm, how about using the same style with show_free_areas() ?
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_NSTATS; i++)
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%lu ", mem_cgroup_events_names[i],
> + mem_cgroup_read_events(memcg, i));
> +
I don't think EVENTS info is useful for oom.
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_LRU_LISTS; i++)
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%luKB ", mem_cgroup_lru_names[i],
> + K(mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(memcg, BIT(i))));
How far does your new information has different format than usual oom ?
Could you show a sample and difference in changelog ?
Of course, I prefer both of them has similar format.
> + } else {
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_STAT_NSTATS; i++) {
> + long long val = 0;
> +
> + if (i == MEM_CGROUP_STAT_SWAP && !do_swap_account)
> + continue;
> + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
> + val += mem_cgroup_read_stat(mi, i);
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%lldKB ", mem_cgroup_stat_names[i], K(val));
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < MEM_CGROUP_EVENTS_NSTATS; i++) {
> + unsigned long long val = 0;
> +
> + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
> + val += mem_cgroup_read_events(mi, i);
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%llu ",
> + mem_cgroup_events_names[i], val);
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < NR_LRU_LISTS; i++) {
> + unsigned long long val = 0;
> +
> + for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(mi, memcg)
> + val += mem_cgroup_nr_lru_pages(mi, BIT(i));
> + printk(KERN_CONT "%s:%lluKB ", mem_cgroup_lru_names[i], K(val));
> + }
> + }
> + printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
> +}
> /**
> - * mem_cgroup_print_oom_info: Called from OOM with tasklist_lock held in read mode.
> * @memcg: The memory cgroup that went over limit
> * @p: Task that is going to be killed
> *
> @@ -1569,6 +1628,8 @@ done:
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_USAGE) >> 10,
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_LIMIT) >> 10,
> res_counter_read_u64(&memcg->kmem, RES_FAILCNT));
> +
> + mem_cgroup_print_oom_stat(memcg);
> }
please put directly in print_oom_info()
Thanks,
-Kame
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-08 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-07 8:40 [PATCH V2 0/2] Provide more precise dump info for memcg-oom Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 8:40 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] memcg, oom: provide more precise dump info while memcg oom happening Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 8:41 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 18:02 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-07 18:02 ` David Rientjes
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211070956540.27451-X6Q0R45D7oAcqpCFd4KODRPsWskHk0ljAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-08 12:37 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 12:37 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 12:37 ` Sha Zhengju
[not found] ` <509BA799.505-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-08 12:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-08 12:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-08 12:44 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <1352277696-21724-1-git-send-email-handai.szj-3b8fjiQLQpfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 22:17 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-07 22:17 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-07 22:17 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20121107221709.GB26382-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-08 12:45 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 12:45 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 12:45 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 9:07 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki [this message]
2012-11-08 9:07 ` Kamezawa Hiroyuki
[not found] ` <509B7658.1020807-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-08 13:12 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 13:12 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 13:12 ` Sha Zhengju
[not found] ` <1352277602-21687-1-git-send-email-handai.szj-3b8fjiQLQpfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 8:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] oom: rework dump_tasks to optimize memcg-oom situation Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 8:41 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 8:41 ` Sha Zhengju
[not found] ` <1352277719-21760-1-git-send-email-handai.szj-3b8fjiQLQpfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-07 18:07 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-07 18:07 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-07 18:07 ` David Rientjes
2012-11-07 22:34 ` Michal Hocko
2012-11-07 22:34 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <20121107223437.GC26382-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2012-11-08 13:58 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 13:58 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-08 13:58 ` Sha Zhengju
2012-11-07 19:31 ` [PATCH V2 0/2] Provide more precise dump info for memcg-oom Andrew Morton
2012-11-07 19:31 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=509B7658.1020807@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=handai.szj@gmail.com \
--cc=handai.szj@taobao.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.