Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] NVIDIA Tegra DRM driver

[Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>]

On 11/12/2012 11:47 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 05:17:18PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 11/12/2012 02:55 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> This second version of this patch series addresses all the
>>> comments received so far. Most notably it takes advantage of
>>> the debugfs helpers provided by the DRM core. Oddly enough this
>>> actually increases the line count, but that's because the
>>> helpers don't fit with the subdevices approach as implemented
>>> by this driver. However some quick discussions with Rob Clark
>>> showed that Tegra DRM is not special in this respect but other
>>> drivers may need the same functionality. Eventually the
>>> debugfs code could be reworked on top of helpers that are
>>> better suited at the design of embedded, multi-device DRM
>>> drivers.
>>> 
>>> Other than that there is some removal of code that was actually
>>> supposed to go into a later patch because it has dependencies
>>> that haven't been merged yet and some moving around of #defines
>>> and the device tree bindings documentation. Finally the driver
>>> now uses the DRM core's drm_compat_ioctl() instead of a custom
>>> and unimplemented (!) version.
>> 
>> The series,
>> 
>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> 
>> (on the Harmony board's HDMI output; I'll test other
>> boards/outputs later).
> 
> You also gave an Acked-by for the DT binding documentation in the
> first version of this patchset, does it apply to the rest of the
> patch as well? That is, can I add it to patch 1?

I didn't actually read the rest of the patch since there are many
people much more familiar with the host1x/... code that will provide
useful feedback.

However, yes, I think it's fine to include my ack in the patch - it's
common to ack only parts of patches I believe.